 |
|  |
 |
|
moomin
|
 |
Moo Like In Moomin
Jul 2000 time: 05:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dr Strangelove
Why Kurds? Stockholm is a long way from northern Iraq.
|
We had a couple of cases where traditionally-minded Kurdish immigrant families offed their daughters for such terrible offenses as wanting to choose their husbands themselves and having the extremely poor taste of choosing Swedes! In Sweden, can you imagine. Now, however righteous such valiant defense of family honour might seem to some Kurds, racist Swedish authorities had the gall to take offense and sentence the perps to prison. So far, so good.
But under pressure from various interests groups, mostly feminists, Swedish newspapers have now abandoned the traditional stance of waiting for convictions before publishing name and picture and have gone on a full disclosure rampage as soon as any Kurd is suspected of killing his daughter. We have one such case right now.
Actually, it's rather entertaining watching the contortions PC groups go through over this issue. On one hand, you can't have medieval rules for women, on the other hand taking Kurds to task over this is clearly racist. The current best solution, practiced daily in Swedish newspapers, is to combine thoughtful feminst analysis with amazing amounts of PC retoric fall-out to arrive at the conclusion that it's Swedish males that are to blame for all of this because, after all, Swedish women occasionally get murdered as well.
It's still the Kurds that we needen't bother the courts with in order to establish their guilt. Go figure.
quote:
Has Sweden entered into an alliance with Iraq?
|
I guess you could say so. Sweden is a part of the European Union, after all.
However, in this particular case it's not so much cheering Saddam for his courageous resistance against the Imperialist Yank Pigs as ardent feminist zeal. Anti-Americanism sure makes for strange bedfellows.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rogan Josh
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
And, let's further assume that deflation is at 10%. That 980 is worth approx. $1080 in constant value buying power. The loan cost you 1080-1000 (you kept 20) = 80. |
Think of it this way Ned. Assume you have no money and no possesions of any kind. Nothing at all!
Now, if you do nothing, you will still have nothing in a years time. Nada, zilch, squat. But with KH's loan, you would have $20 at the end of the year, in your hand. Irrespective of the value of the $20, it is still more than zero. Ego, you have made a profit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rogan Josh
Think of it this way Ned. Assume you have no money and no possesions of any kind. Nothing at all!
Now, if you do nothing, you will still have nothing in a years time. Nada, zilch, squat. But with KH's loan, you would have $20 at the end of the year, in your hand. Irrespective of the value of the $20, it is still more than zero. Ego, you have made a profit. |
Right. However, since you have no assets, no one will loan you the money.
Take the example one step further. I the bank can hold the 1000 for a year and make 10%. Or I can, for example, make 10 loans (lets forget margin and other requirements for a moment) and make 80 per. That 100 vs. 800 in real value. Which is better?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Well Ned is right and Ned is wrong. Nothing wrong with the theory of what he is saying, but the practical application wouldn't work because most people can't wrap their mind around the concept.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Scary... like that famous quote about the guy not saying anything when the Nazis came for other people... and then there was no one left to speak for him when they came for him. |
First they came for the Jews
and I did not speak out — because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for the communists
and I did not speak out — because I was not a communist.
Then they came for the trade unionists
and I did not speak out — because I was not a trade unionist.
Then they came for me —
and by then there was no one left to speak out for me.
In Germany they first came for the Communists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Communist.
Then they came for the Jews,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a Jew.
Then they came for the trade unionists,
and I didn't speak up because I wasn't a trade unionist.
Then they came for the Catholics,
and I didn't speak up because I was a Protestant.
Then they came for me -
and by that time no one was left to speak up.
When Hitler attacked the Jews I was not a Jew, therefore I was not concerned. And when Hitler attacked the Catholics, I was not a Catholic, and therefore, I was not concerned. And when Hitler attacked the unions and the industrialists, I was not a member of the unions and I was not concerned. Then Hitler attacked me and the Protestant church — and there was nobody left to be concerned.
Pastor Martin Niemöller
there are the 3 versions of what he said.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|