 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:21
|
|
Chegitz:
We learn all that in schools in Philly... What we don't learn about is the specific battles or European history... People pay more attention to Marcus Garvey than World War 1 or the other events of the 1920's... hell I can't even name what else was going on in the 20's besides Garvey, the Great Migration, Jazz, and the Harlem Rennaisance... what was going on politically besides when it came to pre-Civil Rights? What was happening in pre-depression post-WW1 Europe? I honestly have no idea and this is bothering me...
thanks
thanks
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:21
|
|
Imran:
Nah... the founding fathers protected their class during the "Conservative Revolution" that was the Constitution. The American Revolution was about freedom and equality but such decisions as acceptance of slavery and retaining of citizenship rights to white males with property were a conservative reaction.
thanks
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:21
|
|
Imran:
I think the modern emphasis on history is social history. It has to do with our increasing pacifism and comfort with life... historians of previous years were chroniclers of battles and wars and the acts of kings and leaders. Now we live in an 'equal peaceful society' so our history reflects this, being devoid of the specifics of war and paying more attention to the common man than the leaders.
thanks
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:21
|
|
See thats the thing... because there's so limited time to teach and only so much kids will actually take in, having them memorize dates is tedious and does not do much for them. Unfortunately, people can take the opposing side too far and ignore everything except minority cultural movements.
thanks
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kaak
|
|
history is history. teach it all and don't seperate it damnit
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:21
|
|
Imran:
I think it's a memorization issue... it's bullshit to have kids memorize a thousand dates and battle names and locations when a general understanding of events is easier to learn, easier to remember, and has more practical value... the problem is, schools dont seem to be teaching that either...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:21
|
|
Imran:
what's Austerlitz? how did it change the course of history?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:21
|
|
"Unless you are sticking merly to dates and names, history is entirely about ideology and politics. Dispite the fact that you disagree with it's politics, it is simply the best American history text out there. Who Built America? is quite good, but it's not as in depth as Zinn's book."
No, you can talk about events, and cause and effect between events. For instance, talking about Ancient, you can discuss the failure to bring unity to Greece and the the feuding between the States led to Macedonian to conquest. And said conquest along with organization done by Phillip gave Alexander the Great a base to expand with, which led to Alex's conquest and the spread of Hellenic ideas throughout the East. Or for Japan, Tokugawa winning control of Japan leads to a long period of explanation. High school needn't go over every theory over what has happened, it should give the fundamentals as to what happened, and encourage studies to come up with their own ideas- not propgandizing them into trying to make them believe history is all class struglle or portraying the USA as the bad guy like you would.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|