 |
|  |
 |
|
Pandemoniak
|
 |
of Xanadu, French Section of the Apolyton Must Crush Capitalism Party
Jul 2002 time: 06:21
|
|
Punishment Spheres is a henious invention. It must not be use in any case, since the sanctions done to criminals are far worst than the crimes themselves. I repeat : Punishment Spheres is a henious invention, and I'll do everything in my power to avoid such atrocities.
As a humanist, I stand for the developpement or less radicals countermeasures against criminality. It is an obvious thing that criminality comes from over-exploitation of people and boredom, and thus, if we can provide work, recreation, games, and maintain a decent police for casual incivilness, we will have the best results.
Pandemoniak
in Speech to the CDC
Comment : I am not there talking for the CCCP but for myself, though Im positive all the CCCP members will agree with me that criminals shouldnt be punished but helped.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Voltaire
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Aug 2001 time: 22:21
|
|
Well, I’ve just returned to be greeted by this good news. And I would like to welcome our new allies the members of the EDP.
Also, here’s the updated version of what positions CDC members are running for.
Commissioner: Darkness' Edge (CD)
Alpha Talent: ---
Directory of Terraforming and Colonization: Pandemoniak (CCCP)
Directory of Science and Technology: Voltaire (LSD)
Directorty of Peacekeeping Operations: ---
Directory of Foreign Affairs: Ade (LSD)
Directory of Energy and Industry: ---
Director of Social Engineering: Kassiopeia (LSD)
Director of Exploration and Intelligence: FlameFlash (EDP)
quote: Personally, I support a more balanced research distribution rather than beelining to social engineering techs. My personal priorities are Explore and Discover techs, as well as getting Secrets of the Human Brain early to speed research However, going by any one plan in tech research tends to marginalize those who disagree with the plan. If I become Science Director, I intend to poll before every tech, to give the minority in the last poll the opportunity to form a majority in the next one. (I'm not implying that you wouldn't poll, only that polling before every tech would tend to make long-term plans problematic.) |
AdamTG02, I will give you my assurances that I consider both Discovery and Explore technologies to be of immense importance, more so than even Conquer and Build, I will therefore if elected Director of Science and Technology be most adamant in my push for research in those sectors; but I will try to balance this with what technologies would be most suitable depending on the situation, and I will of course welcome suggestions from anyone on the matter. As for polling before every tech, I agree that it would make long term planning difficult but I would still like to have the opinions of the public at hand before making a decision when possible, though of course the final decision will be made by the Commissioner and I will strive to provide him with as much information as possible in order to make his decision as easy as possible.
And seeing as not all positions have been filled perhaps you would consider running for some other directory which also is of great importance to the EDP agenda, and if I may suggest the position of Director of Energy and Industry as it stands is quite powerful and it would do the Coalition well if we had one of our own in the seat.
quote: On another topic, the P4 has said in the party memberlist thread that they favor a single Punishment Sphere, supporting most of our offensive units at that base. Is there a general CDC consensus against Punishment Spheres? |
I don’t believe the issue has been discussed by the CDC or any of its member parties, so perhaps now would be a good time to see where the CDC stands on the issue. The P4 idea to have one base with a Punishment Sphere is interesting, but I don’t believe that it will be a requirement seeing as though the CDC does favour running Free Market for a brief period of time, we wish to avoid the ecological damage as well as the low police rating making it more difficult to have an effective military force. And though I do not share the same humanistic attitudes as Pandemoniak, I vote against Punishment Spheres seeing as I do not believe we will find them necessary.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Voltaire
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Aug 2001 time: 22:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
quick questions:
1. is CDC extreme left? or just left, centre or right (or extreme right)
2. i know of some of the joined parties there view on atrocities but what about CDC can you tell me of a place where you intire policy is written (or just what you have) or a quick sum up of real game choises not idiolgy? |
The CDC is left on the political spectrum, though not by design, rather the parties that joined all have some left ideology.
The CDCs policies, seeing as it is a coalition, are dictated by the coalition members. Therefore party policies are in part CDC policies, though the CDC also attempts to work out compromises if there are minute differences on which the parties disagree on. But the parties that have joined the CDC all have almost identical SE preferences, and the same goals. We are all in favor of Democracy and Knowledge as ideal SE choices, there are some differences as to weather we should go either Green or Planned as the ideal SE choice, but I believe that all parties are in agreement that we will use all economic models as some point in the game (however brief), such as Planned early on for the industrial bonus as well as the growth bonus as so on.
As for atrocities, since all member parties are opposed to atrocities the CDC policy is the same.
And this would be a good time to get the official standing of all CDC members (seeing as we’ve just recently received a new one) on economic and future SE choices.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
AdamTG02
|
 |
Williamsburg, Virginia
Aug 2002 time: 00:21
|
|
I've submitted my withdrawal from the Director of Science race. I agree with Academician Voltaire's stated policies and he has my support.
Running for Director of Energy and Industry is a possibility, but organizing the EDP is taking enough of my time as it is, and base production is probably the most time-intensive job of any of the ministers.
Once the school year starts, it may be that I'll have more free time than I expect to. If that's the case, and if I feel the post needs an EDP and CDC voice, then I'll consider running for it. As it is, with FlameFlash running for Exploration and Intelligence, Pandemoniak for Terraforming and Colonization, Voltaire for Science and Technology, and Ade for Foreign Affairs, I feel the EDP point of view is adequately represented. And we'll definitely try to make our presence known on base production polls.
Wishing you all the best of luck. (And just because I didn't mention you doesn't mean I don't support you. Those were just the four that came to mind.)
Edited to include EDP's Social Engineering views: The core philosophy of the EDP is our commitment to exploration and scientific advancement. Within that framework, diverse views on social issues can be had. However, I personally support social provisions that foster growth in the early game (Democratic/Planed), and for the mid and late game favor social engineering that allows funds to be efficiently devoted to research (Democratic/Green/Knowledge, and Eudaimonia for growth and econ when we can get that).
Last edited by AdamTG02 on 09-08-2002 at 01:38
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Juliennew
|
|
Paris
Jun 2002 time: 06:21
|
|
quote: That will be true if the P4 doesnt ally with the CP |
We are already independent and don't plan any alliance or coaltion with the CP nor anyone for the moment.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Pandemoniak
|
 |
of Xanadu, French Section of the Apolyton Must Crush Capitalism Party
Jul 2002 time: 06:21
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DeathByTheSword
But can you please tell me why the CCCP joined the CDC there 'pigs' in there ranks too (i believe) and
|
I havent seen any pigs in any CDC congress, except for that time someone rushed in and interrupted the congress to say his word.
quote:
I tought that the CCCP believed in a one-party system without help of others ( ) |
I dont know where you got that, there's no reference to a unique party in the CCCP line. If you are referring to Marxism, you'd better know that Marx never supported a one party system. Actually, his main politic theory, what is mostly know under the name of communism, has the goal to suppress the notion of state itself. Since social classes struggles is the engine of history, you can then abolish social classes, stop history, and therefore abolish state itself.
But if there's no state, there's no party at all, just citizens.
Moreover, the CCCP is more attached to Marx's economical theories than to his political theories.
Read "Le Capital".
Note that this discussion shouldnt occur in the CDC congress, though. So if you want to discuss that with me, please meet me at the CCCP headquarters.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:21. Apolyton Time is 00:21. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|