 |
|  |
 |
|
History Guy
|
 |
Reads too many books...
Oct 2001 time: 23:22
|
|
Hagbart-- Knud would be a rather bad choice, actually, if the Firaxians wish to have the leader a Viking that personifies all that the name means. Knud was not a Viking in the big, raiding warrior type. He was an empire builder. Furthermore, he lived at the very end of the Viking period, and would therefore not be the best choice of leader.
Ragnar, on the other hand, is a good choice. He DID raid BOTH France and England, capturing Paris and meeting his end in Northumbria, dying like a man. It is only the ones who die bravely, like Ragnar, who end up in Valhalla, right, Hagbart? Knud died an old man, not the Viking sort of thing at all. Take Harald Hardrada, Eirik Bloodaxe, or, even better, Ragnar Lodbrok, and you get the sort of man we imagine as being a total Viking.
As for dying in a snake pit, Ragnar went out valiantly, singing the sagas and the like. Not cowardly in the least.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|