 |
|
slamp
|
 |
Cannes, France
Sep 1999
time: 06:12
|
|
Quins, I posted it on january 12th and 14th... here is it again:
turn 99: about september 16th 2000
Klair, Slamp, St Jon, Duck Hunter, [King Thor], max_webster, [TheBirdMan], Frazer
turn 109: about october 17th 2000
Klair, Slamp, St Jon, [King Thor], max_webster, Duck Hunter, Frazer, [TheBirdMan]
turn 119 : november 12th 2000
Klair, Slamp, St Jon, max_webster, King Thor, Duck Hunter, Frazer, TheBirdMan
turn 129 : december 10th 2000
Klair, Slamp, St Jon, max_webster, King Thor, Duck Hunter, Frazer, TheBirdMan
turn 139 : january 13th 2001
Klair, Slamp, St Jon, max_webster, King Thor, Duck Hunter, Frazer, TheBirdMan
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Keygen
|
|
Athens, Hellas
Jan 2000
time: 07:12
|
|
If you want to put the link to a web page then you need to put a HTML tag Solver. Otherwise you will have to post the address and cut and paste the link to the browser's address bar.
Anyway I have downloaded the zip file and emailed it to Quinns if that was the problem!?!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
quinns
|
|
Keygen, thanks I got it. As requested by Solver, I have a new link above under "Additional Report Links" called "Solver's PBEM Charts Download".
The number of points you gain or lose is variable depending upon the player rating difference and which player was higher on the power graph. See the "Ratings Formulas" link above for more information.
Slamp, thanks but all I need, intitially, is the player TURN order for Dutcheese. And I thought I remember reading that you were only going start rating this game from turn 119 forward, not from 99. Can someone who is playing Dutcheese, get a concensus, and help clarify this for me?
|
|
| |
|
|
|
quinns
|
|
Solver... "Silence" yourself! Who were you directing that comment to?? Again, I was answering questions completely unrelated to your little charts that I have placed on MY site, paid for with MY money. And Slamp, "Thanks for the Update..." (you need to learn some courtesy Solver, man... :shaking my head: )
[This message has been edited by quinns (edited February 02, 2001).]
|
|
| |
|
|
|
quinns
|
|
Thor, maybe the following will help, if not, post again. Regarding only one person taking credit for taking a player out, I don't believe that's fair. It could be that some other nation did all the work at eliminating a nation, but the last city falls to a nation that did nothing but take that last city. See below existing rule:
From the first thread of CTP Ratings:
"
Elimination Rule
If, in a rated game, a player:
a) resigns;
b) changes status from "rated" to "unrated";
c) gets annihilated; or
d) gets "next turned" for three turns in a row,
then every remaining player in that game "DEFEATS" THAT PLAYER THREE TIMES (as measured by the normal
ten turn phase defeat).
For example, in a 5 player game, the first person who gets "eliminated from the ratings in that game" would be
"defeated" 12 times (as measured by the normal power graph 10 turn defeat), (3 multiplied by 4 remaining
players.) This equates to an average decrease in ratings of about 2 to 3 points for the eliminated player. The
second player eliminated would be defeated 9 times (3 multiplied by 3 remaining players), ... etc.
In the case of resignation or three consecutive "next turns", then that resigned player's civilization will be
"next turned" until a replacement player, (either rated or unrated), takes over that civilization's control."
|
|
| |
|
|
|
quinns
|
|
That's not true Keygen. Sorry to contradict you. According to what we agreed upon earlier, the eliminated player gets defeated 3 times by all the other remaining players. That includes increases to the survivors and major decreases to the eliminated one.
And Thor, your scenario is WAY to hard to prove. Think about it. How would you PROVE that you "single handedly" took out another nation? 234 screen shots?? Forget it. (By the way, Slamp put you down as being "rated" in Ducheese... is that true??)
Quinns
[This message has been edited by quinns (edited February 02, 2001).]
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
quinns
|
|
Alright Solver... Here it is in plain talk. It was not really that interesting. I was being sarcastic about you being the only one who posted without the turn number. Everyone else posted the turn number with their Power Graph results. So I thought I would be a bit sarcastic to get my point across to include the "turn number" next time so that I don't have to research it myself.
Is that a little clearer? Sorry if it sounds harsh, Solver, but I know that English is your third language and I must be more direct in what I am saying.
Quinns
[This message has been edited by quinns (edited February 03, 2001).]
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:12.
Apolyton Time is 00:12. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
01-02-2001 21:22
.
|