 |
| |
|
|
ranskaldan
|
 |
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001
time: 00:23
|
|
everyone (well, maybe not everyone) seems to be going for this bright future with democracy and freedom sort of model.
The world is rarely perfect. Neither are representative democracy or liberalism the best possible systems that a society can have.
After all, if you ask a 19th century intellectual what a perfect world 2002 would be, he'd tell you some sort of world where the West has cleared out all the native peoples, instituted a worldwide communist society, and started genetically engineering everyone into blond blue-eyed tall athletic geniuses wearing togas and driving flying cars.
Shudder @ that.
As for the world 100 years from now,...
- US: will slowly shut down, as is inevitable for all superpowers. (They get complacent and start dozing etc, happened to China, Turkey and Britain, so...)
- Europe: wouldn't become a superpower. They're already going thru the aforementioned dozing phase.
- Japan: same as Europe
- China: don't count on democratic reforms. In 50 years it'll be the same, only richer and more powerful. Taiwan would have been soundlessly absorbed.
- India: either control the population (and get rid of that byzantine socialisto-demokratisto system), or implode.
- ME: pretty much the same. I don't know what will happen when the oil runs out though...
- Africa: heck, I really don't see anything coming for Africa. On the other hand, I'm sure the Arabs and Chinese didn't see anything coming for Europe in 1000 either.
- South America: they'll probably be the last remaining allies of America.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
ranskaldan
|
|
Beijing ~ Singapore ~ Toronto ~ All hail to the new Rome
Sep 2001
time: 00:23
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Sagacious Dolphin
I doubt that many intellectuals would have envisaged that as the model society. You've selected the worst traits of various ideals.
Select some of the better ideals, such as "a chicken in every pot". (as a concept to avoid world hunger) |
That's exactly the problem with philosophical ideals, ideals like "communism", "equality", "democracy", "capitalism", "security", etc... They all have their "worst traits", so a future society where a certain philosophy has totally triumphed across the world is hardly my idea of a perfect future. Unfortunately, many people do look forward to a "totally communistic" future, a "totally democratic" future, or other such ideals equally popular with 19th and 21st century people alike.
Now, as for "a chicken in every pot", I think it'll be great to achieve something like that, but the problem is, how? Certainly not by pursuing a certain philosophy to the end, I am sure.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Imran Siddiqui
|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970
time: 00:23
|
|
In 50 years:
- Oil will be a relic of the past. Western states won't have anything that still uses oil. Hydrogen fuel cells will rule.
- The United States were stay at the same absolute power, but decline (rapidly) in relative power.
- EU will consolidate further. It will hit some growing pains in 10-20 years when attempting to widen and deepen the EU at the same time, but when that is done they will accelerate.
- China will gradually become more free market and more democratic. It will still be ruled by one party, but voting in the party will be expanded.
- India and Pakistan will end up in many 'crises', but because of the nuclear question the world will intervene preventing conflict.
- The end of reliance on oil in the West will lead to making the Middle East poor. However, before the Arab countries fall they will attempt to rally the forces against Israel. The region will move very close to war until outside intervention by NATO prevents that. Terrorism increases substantially for 10 years and then the youth of Arab states begin massive demonstrations that rock the foundations of Arab states. Democracy begins to flourish, but it is a rocky process.
- Africa gains a bit. Wars diminish in number, but the continent has been ravaged by AIDS and thus unable to make many inroads.
- Latin America gradually moves more democrat, with the US unwilling to make overt regime changes there because of increased public pressure against that mode of action.
- Russia gains by leaps and bounds, but it ruled by a succession of strong willed leaders. At times it seems that Russia will slip back into totalitarianism, but elections are still guarenteed.
- Japan eventually (5 years) moves out of its massive recession and reorganizes its country and economy in order to challenge the US and EU again.
So a multi-polar system, which dominate the UN, which gains more power, but still isn't that powerful.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Amadan
|
|
"Humans never solve social problems, they just outmode them by creating new ones."
-- can't remember where this is from at the moment.
Regional power blocks like the EU will continue and strengthen, if only as a responce to bullying US policy.
The middle east will continue (as it has for the past 2000 years) to be a hot-spot of war.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Ethelred
|
|
In the next twenty-five years genetic engineering will become a reality for humans to at least the degree it now is with plants.
Computers will finally reach the limit of Moore's law.
Nanotech is now in its first steps and I see no reason that it won't dovetail with genetic engineering within twenty-five years. It might take 50 though. Nanotech goes with reaching the limit of Moores Law.
Ageing will be slowed and then reversed but that might not start till the confluence of nanotech and genetic engineering happens. I may still be alive. Most of the people here on Poly will be.
Of course that would mean few would ever get to retire but if we don't overpopulate the place too badly work should be quite different than it is now.
Russia will eventually get it together again. I don't mean as the Soviet Union just their economy will recover.
Europe will continue to become a single block unless the population gets out of hand.
Africa will change eventually as nano and bio tech tranform the world economy much as computers has allready transformed the economy of the first world nations.
Of course India and Pakistan along with the Islamic fundamentalist could mess this up for everyone with a nuke or two dozen. I think the governments of India and Pakistan have finally figured out the Nukes makes things different in the Sub-Continent. Maybe not. I sure hope so because that place is a mess and its going to get worse if they don't both get a handle on things, including the population growth.
|
|
| |
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23.
Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
14-10-2002 01:33
. Even in the 19th Century, you didn't have that great of a change. Sure the great powers and war tech changed, but the underlying system was basically the same.
There are people of Muslim faith on this board. Maybe you should be a bit more considerate with your hyperbole before posting such things? Replace "Muslim" with "Jew" and you have an offensive antisemetic comment. I see yours as just as offensive.
.
|