 |
|
dejon
|
|
Meshelic: Sorry, but I cannot accept your argument, it is just the same old warmonger reasoning.
I fail to see what could be wrong with strengthing both our cities and armies during a peacetime. Odds are that before long someone will declare war on us, which then provides the opportunity for growth, or that other civs will war, presenting us with profitable alliance options.
In the meantime, rather than rushing buildings and units on the battlefront, we can spend our money and effort on building all our cities into a much better position to wage war a little bit down the road.
From previous posts, it seems as though Thud and Reddawg agree with me. However the warmonger:builder ratio around here is alarming.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
dejon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Meshelic
dejon - you are saying that you think a quick 5-10 turn war (one without the issue of civil disorder to worry about) in which we capture both an iron and saltpeter resource, thereby decreasing our chances of having a strong enemy is not a good thing? C'mon! I may be a Hawk, that does not necessarily mean I'm a warmonger. I support this war because it promises to lessen the threat to our borders!
You would rather have strong enemies surrounding us? |
Ditto what Torkkeli said.
In addition, I believe that starting any war now would open the proverbial floodgates again - leading to wars with the English, Germans, and whoever else the War Academy hungers to destroy.
I will resist all attempts to break the peace, because I believe it may be the last peace period in which we can improve our infrastructure for awhile.
If you support peace let your voice be heard amongst the crowd! So far I count Thud, Reddawg, Torkkeli, WhiteBandit, and myself. I suspect E_T would agree, but I'll let him explicitly say so.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CiverDan
|
|
Lets not start a war with France unless we feel we can handle at least one other civ possibly joins France against us. With our current forces, this means that our eastern knight force has to stay there (i.e. it can't be used to assist any France attack). Otherwise we could be in trouble if they get allies in the east.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CiverDan
|
|
I agree with attacking them now IF we are going to attack them. If they get their GA it could be a longer war.
Another thing to consider, France could get involved with a war with someone else if they get musketeers, get a GA, and, depending on the opponent, could still get out of it w/o losing any cities. Thoughts on consequences of this (if it happens)?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|