 |
Who should be Domestic Minister?
This poll is closed. |
| E_T |
   |
27 |
50.00% |
| GhengisFarb |
   |
27 |
50.00% |
| Total: |
54 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
E_T
|
 |
Orlando, Florida
Mar 2001 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by nz_upy
This is the Key Issue here
E_T sees the position as one almost equal to the President from what I gather in his posts. And the NewCon definitely left it to be interpreted that way.
|
Yes, it is a powerful position, but the New Con set it up that way. As for being almost like the Prez, that's not quite true. With the addition powers that the new con has bestowed, to each of the ministers, comes a lot of responsability to the Senate. We are still here by their whim. The budget for rushes will be by their whim. With the NewCon, it's almoist an entirely new game, except we aren't starting in 4000AB.
quote:
I, having grown used to the OldCon, still view it as a supportive position whose primary goals are to do what the President directs and simply achieve his goals and providing input into the direction.
Either is a perfectly rational way to view it under the NewCon, it simply comes down to whether you want a Domestic Minister who is fulfilling their vision for Apolytonia, or one who plans to fulfill a more collective vision."
|
Why can't they be one and the same, just different in the implementation? My vision is for it to be a Great Nation, Isn't that what everybody wants? I really haven't heard anyone say that they want to lose or that they don't want to become independant from the A.I.
It's how we do these things that is in the details of the interpitation of a collective dream. That should not be confused with the dream it's self.
quote:
Does this border on anything? |
Meglamenia, but how can you be that to a bunch of electronic people in a virtual world? Feed them false information to sway their decision to your own is one, but wait, I've always made every effort to properly info the population, because I felt they needed to know things.
So, how do you do it, I'd like to know, so I can watch out for it in someone else.
E_T
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
E_T
|
 |
Orlando, Florida
Mar 2001 time: 00:23
|
|
[EDIT]
Wrong day
E_T
Last edited by E_T on 15-11-2002 at 01:52
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GhengisFarb
|
 |
I want my HAMBURGERS!!
May 2002 time: 23:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by WhiteBandit
Well Trip vs. Ninot for President in Term 2 was at nearly 50/50 all the way up to nearly 100 votes :-P
Though they also believed in forming a coalition government which was shot down by the people.
I think a coalition government is a bad idea, especially in this case as you two have completely different views on how you want to run things. Neither is neccesarily bad, but this could cause many problems and much frustration in getting things done. |
I was thinking splitting it down the middle, we would each get half of the cities and workers and race to see who could accomplish the most in one term's time.
Kind of an Eastern, and Western Empire situation. One would get the Palace and the other would get the Forbidden Palace.
It is an option:
quote: Originally posted by Togas
Article VII. Elections
6 If no candidate for office receives more than 50% of the vote, there shall be a run-off election held from the 15th to the 18th.
(a) The Court shall create a run-off poll with the two candidates who received the most votes.
7 Ties shall be resolved by the Court in any manner of their choosing.
|
According to the NewCon there is NO runoff because there were already only two options. The only time there is a runoff is if there were more than two options and the top two would be in the runoff.
In the case of a tie the issue is to be "resolved by the court" so they could split it down the middle.
Last edited by GhengisFarb on 15-11-2002 at 02:49
|
|
|  |
 |
|
adaMada
|
 |
"The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Mar 2000 time: 00:23
|
|
Hmmm... Interesting excerpt. I think part seven was probably intended to deal with a tie after a runoff, but I'd have to talk to the other ConCon members to be sure -- I don't remember it being explicitly discussed (Togas, who authored the majority of the document, could probably shed more light into it than I could). Having said that, the matter would probably be in the hands of the court anyway, as we have potentially conflicting sections. Personally? I'd do a runoff before turning to the courts. You'll note that NewCon doesn't say that there must be three canidates or more for a runoff; just if neither gets more than 50% of the vote.
quote:
I was thinking splitting it down the middle, we would each get half of the cities and workers and race to see who could accomplish the most in one term's time.
Kind of an Eastern, and Western Empire situation. One would get the Palace and the other would get the Forbidden Palace. |
That could be very cool -- and could be a nightmare. Would probably be quite hard on the President, and I shutter to think about the politiking that the SMC/FAM might wind up having to go through . Though I see some very cool potential, I'd probably be against any such proposal, since I see a good deal of trouble it could cause, especially considering the very differnet styles of the people involved. (If me and Arnelos were to tie (as unlikely as it may be), I might feel differently, as we are very similar canidates (with similar playing styles) who probably could split the workload and produce similar results. Even in this scenerio, however, it would set a bad precedent...).
-- adaMada
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GhengisFarb
|
 |
I want my HAMBURGERS!!
May 2002 time: 23:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by adaMada
Hmmm... Interesting excerpt. I think part seven was probably intended to deal with a tie after a runoff, but I'd have to talk to the other ConCon members to be sure -- I don't remember it being explicitly discussed (Togas, who authored the majority of the document, could probably shed more light into it than I could). Having said that, the matter would probably be in the hands of the court anyway, as we have potentially conflicting sections. Personally? I'd do a runoff before turning to the courts. You'll note that NewCon doesn't say that there must be three canidates or more for a runoff; just if neither gets more than 50% of the vote.
|
It wouldn't be a "runoff" it would be a repoll because you would have THE EXACT SAME election with the EXACT SAME OPTIONS. A runoff occurs when you drop the superfluous choices and only go with the more popular ones.
quote: Originally posted by adaMada
That could be very cool -- and could be a nightmare. Would probably be quite hard on the President, and I shutter to think about the politiking that the SMC/FAM might wind up having to go through . Though I see some very cool potential, I'd probably be against any such proposal, since I see a good deal of trouble it could cause, especially considering the very differnet styles of the people involved. (If me and Arnelos were to tie (as unlikely as it may be), I might feel differently, as we are very similar canidates (with similar playing styles) who probably could split the workload and produce similar results. Even in this scenerio, however, it would set a bad precedent...). |
Nightmare, smitemare, the game's over, we won. This would spice up the game abit and allow for more roleplay and might stave off some of the Exodus to the PTW Demo Game for a while.
Heck, I'm starting to like this idea so much that if I win I'd be interested in seeing if E_T would like to take a chunk and run with it. With my guarantee that I will make absolutely NO CHANGES to any of his orders.
Last edited by GhengisFarb on 15-11-2002 at 03:50
|
|
|  |
 |
|
adaMada
|
 |
"The Iron" Stadium, Ubergorsk, Apolytonia (C3DG)
Mar 2000 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Aggie
Imagine if we did this for FAM too, luckily adamada and Arnelos are pretty close otherwise our foreign policy could be pretty schitzofreic. I like the idea so much let me official endorse, it time to have some fun with this game.
Aggie |
. That could have some really funny results.
"And in International News Today, Apolytonia signed a mutual protection pact with Greece while also declaring war on it. Apolytonian President Aggie citied a lack of communication between Apolytonia's two foreign ministers, and stated that 'We will honor our treaty obligations while we continue to destroy them'".
In all seriousness, though, the plan Ghengis is proposing could be lots of fun, if Aggie were willing to put up with the difficulties it would create and the other ministers willing to play along. Of course, it would make things much less serious than the game is now, but we're nearly guarenteed a win so we might as well get a bit of extra fun in there .
-- adaMada
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|