 |
|
DinoDoc
|
 |
AECCP loves Democracy
Sep 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
I've had my IR exam. I'm done polluting this thread this thread. If you'd like to continue the discussion, make a new thread and I'll happilly join you there. Just make it on a broader topic, ok. There is only so long that I can discuss the meaning of the word hegemon without going insane.
Last edited by DinoDoc on 13-12-2002 at 07:49
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
No comments eh?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
WHo says they are going to meet on a compromise with out a strike? Do you think a strike is out of the question?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:24
|
|
A strike is not out of the question: but the two sides seemed to have gotten down to one single sticking point: the mythical 0% wage increase for year one. We shall see by 5pm and the big union rally in front of city Hall.
Personally, the MTA should just propose something small, like .5% increase, or shift some of the proposed 2 or 3% wage increases by year 3 up to year one, and get things settled. I understand what the major is trying to do in pressuring the MTA to stick to 0% this year, so that he will have a stronger hands against Firemen and policemen when their contracts come up for negotiation, sicne if the TWU gets a raise, no matter how small, those unions will demand at least something similar at this time of budget crisis. At the same time, the city economy can't handle a strike. So the possible 100 milion cost over one year is better than a 200 million dolar a day cost to the economy as a whoe if a strike occurs, and all the pebnalties on the union members won't help either: it hardly helps the local economy even if it satisfies bloodlust.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
Is 5pm the new deadline?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
I didn't think the strike threat was over, so how can it resume? Do you mean they intend to strike then and there?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
Huh?
From the news:
"The new, three-year deal with the Metropolitan Transportation Authority would include a $1,000 lump-sum payment to workers in the first year, with 3 percent raises in each of the next two years, Toussaint said." |
Which in effect is like getting part or all of the raise a year earlier (since the bonus is only for 1 year). So if you make 50k, for example, you get 51k the first year which is like a 2% increase. The second year, w/o any bonus, you get 51.5k, which is like a 1% increase compared to the previous year w/ bonus. It's simply a matter of perspective.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|