 |
|  |
 |
|
aahz_capone
|
 |
The Hague
Feb 2002 time: 06:24
|
|
This is freaky:
The Issue: Commentators have warned that Imperial Republics's social inequalities threaten to make it an international pariah.
The Debate
"Look, I don't like it either," said Chamber of Commerce spokesperson Freddy Fellow. "Just on the way here, I had to step over three homeless people, and one of my shoes got caught on a beggar. But inequality is the price we pay for economic strength. If anything, we need fewer taxes, so those of us who are well-off can afford to be more generous. If we want to, that is."
[Accept]
"I think we've forgotten what economic strength is all about," says social worker Charles King. "The economy is meant to be a means to a high standard of living, not an end in itself. It's become an excuse for the rich to prosper while the poor fall through the cracks. Not everyone is poor because they don't feel like working. We must provide more welfare."
[Accept]
"Who says we're an international pariah?" demands military honcho Chastity Mistletoe. "What are their names? If that's the way the international community feels, we obviously need to prepare for war."
[Accept]
I chose #2, but I am really tempted to choose three. Has anybody done this? What exactly happens? I want to know!!! 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GeneralTacticus
|
 |
of Melbourne, Australia
Dec 2001 time: 15:24
|
|
Ok, now I've finally come up against an issue that I don't have an answer for.
The Issue
The Department of Defense has put its case for a substantial increase in funding for the coming financial year.
The Debate
1)"There are turbulent times we live in," says Defense Chief Clint Trax. "Turbulent and dangerous. And the only sensible response to that, of course, is to build a lot more weapons. Unless we get the funding we need, I can't promise that we'll be able to defend Centralis's sovereign borders from rogue nations and foreign powers. Or those leaky boatloads of refugees, for that matter."
[Accept]
2) "NO MORE BOMBS," chant the protestors outside Parliament House, in a repetitious and increasingly annoying appeal. Spokesperson Zeke O'Bannon, speaking through a feedback-afflicted microphone, says, "Centralis needs fewer weapons, not more! Make the world a safer place! Disarm now!"
[Accept]
I'm leaning towards just dismissing the issue, as I don't see any need for more military spending but at the same time I don't see any reason for less, either.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GeneralTacticus
|
 |
of Melbourne, Australia
Dec 2001 time: 15:24
|
|
Ok, now I have ANOTHER issue which I can't seem to decide on.
The Issue
A recent poll has revealed high levels of dissatisfaction among the populace about tax rates.
The Debate
1) "Do you know how much of my year's work goes to the government?" demanded angry worker Billy Christmas. "Too much! Government spending has gotten way out of control. It needs big cuts in welfare, health, and education. But leave those subsidies to business alone. We need them to create jobs."
[Accept]
2) "It's not the AMOUNT of tax, it's where the burden falls," says student activist Sue-Ann Summers. "And at the moment, far too much of the burden is falling on the poor. People on high incomes still have more money than people on low incomes. I don't think I need to say anything more than that."
[Accept]
3) "I don't object to the amount of tax, I object to where it's being spent," says social reformer Billy du Pont. "I'd like to see everyone have a choice as to where their tax dollars go every time they fill out a return. Everyone would feel a lot better about opening their wallets if they had a say as to where the money went. I think you'd see a lot more public money going to education and a lot less to business."
[Accept]
EDIT: In order to reverse Centralis' slide to the right, and just on general principles, I intend to pick either 2 or 3, but I can't seem to decide which one.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Vlad Antlerkov
|
 |
Do you have Matt Stairs in your house?
Mar 1999 time: 23:24
|
|
Hmmm, so I'll get a chance to repeal the tariffs later? Hopefully, I'll have some other industries by then.
Unfortunately, I can't mandate higher standards of quality, to my knowledge. If I could, I would.
(Edit: Yes, I'm going with option 1. Need industry, fast...)
(Edit 2: If only I could get through to the fricking page...)
Last edited by Vlad Antlerkov on 04-01-2003 at 06:41
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kassiopeia
|
 |
Jyväskylä, Finland
Jul 2001 time: 07:24
|
|
In a bid to provide a new revenue stream for Greater Finland's Beef-Based Agriculture industry, it has been suggested that Japanese schoolgirls could be added to the menu.
1. "The fact is, the Japanese schoolgirl population is out of control," says Beef-Based Agriculture spokesperson Al Dredd. "We have to do something about them anyway, so why not market them as tasty snacks? We could have Japanese schoolgirl kebabs, Japanese schoolgirl pies, Japanese schoolgirl-on-a-sticks--the possibilities are endless! Let's not pass up this golden opportunity to provide a feast, if you will, for our economy."
2. "I agree that something needs to be done about Japanese schoolgirl over-population," says random passer-by Billy-Bob Longfellow, "but eating them? That's kind of gross. Let's just shoot the ones we have to and shovel their bodies into ditches like normal."
3. "I am shocked and appalled!" declared SPCA President Dave Fellow. "If anyone needs to be culled, it's us humans. The Japanese schoolgirls were here first, remember? We need to take this as a sign to get our industry--agriculture in particular--to back off. The Japanese schoolgirl is part of what makes Greater Finland a great nation!"
Lemmy recommended #1, so I'll go with #3. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kassiopeia
|
 |
Jyväskylä, Finland
Jul 2001 time: 07:24
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drogue
BTW, the Commonwealth of Akiria is interesting in introducing Japanese Schoolgirls into it's lush and beautiful forests. We feel the influx of a new species would do wonders for the eco-system. Would the honourable delegate from Greater Finland agree to such a proposal? We are prepared to trade for them, if it is needed. |
Well, as we have seen from the examples Australia with frogs, rabbits and whatnot has set, it's important to conduct careful studies before introducing entirely new fauna in to an ecosystem.
Does Akiria have an ecological category the schoolgirl fit in to? Are there any natural enemies and food present, and in appropriate measures to control a new population of a new species?
You wouldn't want to end up with all of your lush forests swarming with Japanese schoolgirls starving for some exotic, rough, tentacled... food, like octopuses, now would you?
Last edited by Kassiopeia on 07-01-2003 at 03:08
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dis
|
 |
Las Vegas, Nevada
Feb 2000 time: 21:24
|
|
What's a good libertarian response to this issue? I'm still undecided on it.
As crime rates rise, some in the community are calling for increased policing.
The Debate
"Just the other day, I got mugged in the broad daylight!" says ruffian Bill O'Bannon. "And the ironic thing is I had just stuck up this other guy. When muggers are getting mugged, even I have to admit that crime has gotten out of control. We do need more police."
[Accept]
"The solution to crime is not more police!" says noted sociologist and occasional crime novelist Colin Jefferson. "Studies repeatedly show that crime is caused by poverty and poor education. Increase government spending in these areas, and crime will fall! Maybe not overnight, but it will happen."
[Accept]
"Yeah, good luck with that," says conservative leader and gun enthusiast Clint Thiesen. "Look, we do need more police, that's clear. But that's not enough. We need real punishments: sentences that will act as a genuine deterrent to people considering a life of crime. Like public floggings."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:24
|
|
Greater Finland: Here is a report from our ecology department: quote: Akiria's natural landscape of rolling forests, mountains and high tech neon cities, would be the ideal habitit for Japanese Schoolgirls. We have a lack of predators here, yet our ever increasing population of raw fish, and our health fast food industry, would provide all the nutrition needed, while our hi-tech IT industry can provide for most of their wants and needs. Indeed the introduction of Japanese Schoolgirls would help to curb many of our other species, that currently have populations ballooning out of control, and help the men land to become more fertile. We feel that Akiria is a wonderful habitiat for the Japanese Schoolgirls to live in peace and harmony, and shall provide much enjoyment for our overworked, undersexed political leaders nature watchers  |
I hope this meets your approval? We can reimberse you all expenses, and are willing to trade for them, but we feel our environment is crying out for new species 
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:24. Apolyton Time is 00:24. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|