 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:25
|
|
Just as last year, well given but not well thought out.
The president proposes -670 billion for the budget, and +15 billion minimum (and whatever the March war and aftermath will cost). Something will give, and it will be that AIDS and energy efficiency money.
Can any of you see Tom Delay and the House leadership push for 15 billion to help AIDS in Africa? Honestly? IN what form will the money be used? Direct grants to governments? How do you police it? Grants to NGO's? Which ones? Grants to UNICEF and WHO? Aren't they simply part or a useless organization (UN)?
Lets wait 1 year: but I do feel like making a bet: $20 bucks that come December, that 15 billion for AIDS sort fo got lost in the mail, or in Tom Delay's mailbox.
As for the 'case' agaisnt Iraq: it was emotional, and if you base foreign policy on emotion, it was 'made'. If you agree with his MANY, MANY assumptions, then it was advanced. If you question his assumptions, or view them as false (like me), he did nothing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Chris 62
|
 |
But I'm feeling MUCH better now
Jan 2001 time: 00:25
|
|
I would give it an -A as a speech, he had some surprisses (The Aids package, the Hydro car), his budget stimulas tax cuts, the mentor thing, the faith based relief of drug addicts, ect.
But he seemed to become deadly earnest at the end, stating facts against Saddam, and saying OUTRIGHT Saddam is linked to Al Qaeda.
The Speech also seemed to be directed a bit at France, the comments about the Iraqi shell game with the inspectors, and the statement that the US will "Disarm" (Read that as obliterate) Saddam.
Locke's democratic rebuttal was a bore, wooden promises of 'The Dems have a plan, trust us!"
I don't think so.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Just as last year, well given but not well thought out.
The president proposes -670 billion for the budget, and +15 billion minimum (and whatever the March war and aftermath will cost). Something will give, and it will be that AIDS and energy efficiency money.
Can any of you see Tom Delay and the House leadership push for 15 billion to help AIDS in Africa? Honestly? IN what form will the money be used? Direct grants to governments? How do you police it? Grants to NGO's? Which ones? Grants to UNICEF and WHO? Aren't they simply part or a useless organization (UN)?
Lets wait 1 year: but I do feel like making a bet: $20 bucks that come December, that 15 billion for AIDS sort fo got lost in the mail, or in Tom Delay's mailbox.
As for the 'case' agaisnt Iraq: it was emotional, and if you base foreign policy on emotion, it was 'made'. If you agree with his MANY, MANY assumptions, then it was advanced. If you question his assumptions, or view them as false (like me), he did nothing. |
GePap, you obviously are from Missouri.
However, George Bush said a lot about American values in that speech. He touched on education, drug addicts and charities. He threw the US behind helping African countries stop their AIDS epidemic. I would find it hard to believe than anyone would be against Bush's vision.
He spoke of bringing liberty (from oppression) to the people of Iraq. You are against this in principle. Why?
Further on Iraq, what would it take to convince you that it is Saddam Hussein and not George Bush that is lying?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Static Universe
|
|
Probably the best speech I've ever heard Bush give. Very effective. Surprising to see him actually put a price tag to programs, as he rarely does this.
Funny Osama Bin Laden didn't get a mention. I expected at least a nod to race relations and state budget deficits too.
The Response was the worst I've ever heard. The Democrats certainly could have come up with someone better than Gary Locke. It was like Ensign Kim from Star Trek: Voyager was suddenly governor of Washington.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Alinestra Covelia
Is this the same guy who withdrew from the UN mission to help provide contraceptives and abortions to third world countries?
How nice of him to authorize help to combat AIDS in Africa. |
Well, I would certainly hope that ANY American president would have the character to keep us free of such blatantly immoral activities. Why should America dollars be spent to murder third world babies Alinestra?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:25
|
|
Ned:
It is writen were I am from in my sign.
On AIDS relief: this administration has yet to fullfil its monetary promises to NY City and state. The admin. has a very poor record when it comes to coming up with money it promises, and it does have to get such plans by a congressional leadership in the House that is not much interested. Last Year the senate passed a bill for more millions for AIDS relief but the House never took it up. Can you tell me why the pres. will all of a sudden spend political capitol on this in the House?
On Iraq: "briging liberty to Iraq", please!. The US will end the Saddam regime..whether it will bring liberty is a whole different issue. They are not the same thing, and the Bushies have shown no comprehensive after plan.
As for who is lying: Ned, I have never said Saddam isn't lyin: of course he is. He probably still has Chem and Bipo, though the IEIA inspectors think that hois nuclear program did come to and end. THe point is Ned, that I buy 0 of the admin.s assumptions about why Iraq is a threat. in the last 10 years Saddam has killed excatly 0 Americans, Osama 3000. Yet while Osama is still out there, all of a sudden Saddam is target #1? No, I don't buy the crap that he will give WMD to Al Qaeda or any other organization not under 100% his control, nor do I buy that he would ever use them without provocation agaist the US becase somehow we would fail to catch him: if he believed that, he has had 10 years to do it, and as far as I can see, he hasn't done it. For some reason, he must think its not that simple.
So, to sum it up Ned: I don't trust Saddam at all. He is lying, BUT I DON'T CARE, BECAUSE HE HAS BEEN, FOR A DECADE, CONTAINED, AND HE WOULD CONTINUE CONTAINED, FOR AS LONG AS THE US WISHES HIM TO BE. (using some of the president's style, there)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|