 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sir Ralph
Ned, Saddam is of course a bloody dictator, and I wish nothing more than the Iraqi people could overthrow him and establish a more human, may be even democratic government. However, having a dictator does not justify an invasion. If it did, the United States would have to invade many of the other countries in ME, half of South America and 3/4 of Africa too. In fact, the US is even actively supporting many of these Micro-Hitlers, just like they formerly supported Saddam.
On the question of WoMD, well, put facts on the table. Saying "we are convinced, that Saddam has WoMD" proves nothing. I'm sorry to say this, but hardly anyone in Europe considers GWB to be a reliable source of information. Statements without prove are hearsay, not more. Either put the smoking gun on the table, or tell Blix, where he can find it. Bush keeps to brag with his outstanding intelligence data. Why doesn't he use it to convince the world with facts? I dare to say, that he would get much, much more support, in France, Germany, and elsewhere, than with lying, wardrumming and threatening. At least I would say, ok, there's the prove, now go and remove that bastard.
Instead of this, he makes with his "axis of evil", "who's not with us is against us" and similar bull more and more enemies everywhere in the world. The worlds opinion has never been as anti American, as it is now. In the case of France and Germany Bush and Rumsfeld clearly show their outstanding diplomatic skills. If I want to achieve something, it's of course the best choice to piss off my opponent. That letter of the 8 had also not the effect it should. It was made up like a commercial ad, who likes them? Blairs position was known before. Italy, oh well... Bush and Berlusconi are an awesome couple. Let's better be silent about Italy. For Spain I feel a bit sorry, I had a better opinion about Aznar. The other countries are, sorry, insignificant. Danmark helps you how, with 40-60 "hunters" (according to Winston)? What do they hunt? I'm sure they'll be the make or break in this war. |
I don't know what precisely Powell is going to show. But what is rumored here is that we have evidence of an active coverup. The Iraqi's know where the inspectors are going and clean up the site before hand. This is one of the reason they do not want U2 flights. These could aid the inspectors in determining whether a site has been "changed."
As well, we seem to have photos of the mobile bio labs. Obviously, the inspectors will never be able to find these.
We also have evidence that the scientists who could tell us what is going on are under death threats.
The bottom line, Saddam is thwarting the inspections while appearing to cooperate. The inspection regime should no be permitted to continue in this mode.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sir Ralph
Ned, Saddam is of course a bloody dictator, and I wish nothing more than the Iraqi people could overthrow him and establish a more human, may be even democratic government. However, having a dictator does not justify an invasion. If it did, the United States would have to invade many of the other countries in ME, half of South America and 3/4 of Africa too. In fact, the US is even actively supporting many of these Micro-Hitlers, just like they formerly supported Saddam.
On the question of WoMD, well, put facts on the table. Saying "we are convinced, that Saddam has WoMD" proves nothing. I'm sorry to say this, but hardly anyone in Europe considers GWB to be a reliable source of information. Statements without prove are hearsay, not more. Either put the smoking gun on the table, or tell Blix, where he can find it. Bush keeps to brag with his outstanding intelligence data. Why doesn't he use it to convince the world with facts? I dare to say, that he would get much, much more support, in France, Germany, and elsewhere, than with lying, wardrumming and threatening. At least I would say, ok, there's the prove, now go and remove that bastard.
Instead of this, he makes with his "axis of evil", "who's not with us is against us" and similar bull more and more enemies everywhere in the world. The worlds opinion has never been as anti American, as it is now. In the case of France and Germany Bush and Rumsfeld clearly show their outstanding diplomatic skills. If I want to achieve something, it's of course the best choice to piss off my opponent. That letter of the 8 had also not the effect it should. It was made up like a commercial ad, who likes them? Blairs position was known before. Italy, oh well... Bush and Berlusconi are an awesome couple. Let's better be silent about Italy. For Spain I feel a bit sorry, I had a better opinion about Aznar. The other countries are, sorry, insignificant. Danmark helps you how, with 40-60 "hunters" (according to Winston)? What do they hunt? I'm sure they'll be the make or break in this war. |
I don't know what precisely Powell is going to show. But what is rumored here is that we have evidence of an active coverup. The Iraqi's know where the inspectors are going and clean up the site before hand. This is one of the reason they do not want U2 flights. These could aid the inspectors in determining whether a site has been "changed."
As well, we seem to have photos of the mobile bio labs. Obviously, the inspectors will never be able to find these.
We also have evidence that the scientists who could tell us what is going on are under death threats.
The bottom line, Saddam is thwarting the inspections while appearing to cooperate. The inspection regime should no be permitted to continue in this mode.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
My take on this the letter signed is this:
It seriously undermines the efforts for a unified EUI voice on the matter.
It was done in a rather hypocritical manner considering it didnt go through the known EU procedures
and it was a rather laughable but still it was a retort to the strong stance that Germany and France along with other EU countries have taken.
You got to laugh of course considering the leaders of the 8 countries and the manner in which it was done but it still was a knife in the back of the EU's quest to furthering its common foreign policy.
You also have the impressionable little yanks crying new europe! new europe! which is amuzing as well.
All in all a serious breach of the spirit at least of what some in the EU are trying to achieve.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
get the two texts and lets compare
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Untill you do ponder this
quote: "The letter is a move, which poses a problem, because it was done without necessary consultation. But it is also an expression of opinion, which is free among the member states, Simitis said"
"The way that was followed (by the letter) shows there was a lack of consultation, there was no information. This way, we are not helping Europe have a strong voice in the world," |
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
EU (including new comers) 25 members?
in favor: 8
the point is to reach a common ground not going around offering showbiz letters to the US.
this is ridiculous.
Consultation, discussion common ground.
If this is not achieved then, after the discussions we issue a common EU statement stating this point.
Simple, intelligent and dignified.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
BTW dont let your nationality or opinions get the best of you. Germany and France are the cornerstone of the EU's integration process. No letters change that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
definitely.
but lessons can be taken from it by the way EU acts onm this issue.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001 time: 06:25
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
Also why is it Paris & Berlin seem to feel they have a good given right to dictate policy to everyone else? They seldom, if ever, have anyone's best interests in mind but their own so why follow dogmatically what they say? |
They don't have this right. Do the United States have it? If not, why should anyone follow dogmatically what they say? If yes, why?
Also, neither France nor Germany dictate anything. They just say, no for us, you do what you want. What's wrong with it? The only power, who constantly tries all means of threat and pressure to force their policy to all others, is who? The "Land of the free, and the home of the brave".
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Well he should have seen it coming
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|