 |
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:25
|
|
Religion can be positive in some senses... the old idea that if you have an emotion/idea you can't handle internally, you give it a name and "worship" it. That can be helpful, in a way.
As for organised religion... It can be beneficial, comforting and such, but to attain those benefits, you have to be willing to succumb to a bit of mythology and fantasy. Which is not necessarily a bad thing; it can help a lot of people get by. But some people think about spirituality and all that far too much to settle into a "belief rut" like that. And for those people, organised religion is a barrier to be broken.
I think the search for meaning in life has certainly benefitted humanity as a whole, but as for positive aspects of MODERN organised religion? Eh, I think their day is done.
I think I agree with Campbell on this point: We need a new mythology.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:25
|
|
The Positive Aspects Of Negative Thinking
Bad Religion
let's gather 'round the carcass of the old deflated beast, we have
seen it through the accolades and rested in its lea, syntactic is our
elegance, incisive our disease, the swath endogenous of ourselves will
be our quandary, we've nestled in its hollow and we've succkled at its
breast, grandiloquent in attitude, impassioned yet inept, frivolous
gavel our design, ludicrous our threat, excursive expeditions leave us
holding less and less, so what does it mean? when we tell ourselves
it's only for a while we have been deceived and it's only for a moment
that the treasures of our day make life easier to complicate, the
treasure thrown away, i'm so tired of all the ****ed up minds of all
the terrorist religions and their bullshit lines, of all the hand-me-
downs from all industrial crimes and the weeping mothers and those who
aree led som blind, from the plastic protests and the hands of time
and the pursuit of mirth and all hating kind

|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001 time: 23:25
|
|
Any belief in a suspect certainty without proof to at the very least support it is wrong. IMO, there's little difference between faith and fanaticism. In fact, I actually have more respect for fanatics because they at least practice their religion how their respective literatures tell them, too. Too many people simply pick and choose different parts of religion and choose to follow them. And what's the point of that? I have no problem with someone who thinks that there is a God and that he's responsible for our creation. I have a problem with people that are self-righteous and try to impose their beliefs on a society or on others. And I have a huge problem with religion in government. Although there is not a state religion in the US, religion is very much entrenched in the fabric of our pseudo-democracy.
And I didn't say religious people are dumb. My mom and her parents are very religious. And although I don't agree with the beliefs of some, I don't think of myself as being superior in any way. Religion is a human phenomenom. It's part of the socialization of children in a given culture. And it's very difficult to realize that what some of the positive influences in your life (parents, priests, etc) taught you, could be wrong. If someone is taught their whole life that 2+2=5, I don't shun them for being wrong. It's not their fault, or the fault of their parents/religious leaders that they think this; it's been firmly engrained into many cultures. I just happen to think that if there is a God, he left things unknown to us for a reason and we shouldn't bother trying to guess the secrets to the questions that religions attempt to ask. The answers to these questions are out there for us to find. And sitting in a room trying to communicate with a God with your thoughts isn't going to spark a revelation or psychicly create anything.
Many of the morals that religions teach are good, but they are not dependent upon the religion. Many of the philosophies are good, but again, are not dependent upon the religion. It's important for people to understand that human religious scriptures were written by humans and not a deity(s). They are myths and parables written to teach a moral code. But that sort of thought leaves too much room for open interpretation which leads to fanaticism. The downside to religion is so much stronger than the upside that I must conclude that agnosticism is a better way to think.
And I think that deep down you must agree with me in some fashion if you need to create a thread to try and name the good things about religion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:25
|
|
quote: Why do you believe they are 'done?' |
I just think we've reached a point where modern religion has become counterproductive. It's no longer beneficial to worship the god of the Jews/Muslims/Christians, nor any other organised religion. We may have needed it in the past to keep us sane, but we've reached a point, as a culture, where we can explain alot of that stuff...
Modern religion is becoming a crutch... It's doing more harm than good. If people want to keep worshipping, that's fine. I just feel, personally, that the time of the Judeo-Christian-Muslim God (of Abraham and Moses) is kaput.
quote: 3. The "feel-good" factor is the same as getting high from drinking alcohol or doing drugs. | quote: Without the hangover? Sounds pretty good to me. |
So it's a dependency? It may be necessary for a lot of people, but I subscribe to the idea that any and every human is capable of being challenged with reality. The real world may not "feel good" at first, but the whole point of it all is to figure out how to MAKE it good. The comforting blanket of God lulls us to sleep, when we should be striving for... enlightenment? Inner peace? Peace with reality? Whatever you want to classify it as.
Ah, I'm rambling.
quote: Finally, how do you know that my beliefs are false? |
I don't want to say that your beliefs are false. I just believe that your faith, and other faiths, are manifestations of the driving force of life. There is undoubtedly "something more" than what we see and feel, but to give that something a name, a title, and a purpose? That's clearly humanising something that is... so much more than humanity. The god of an ancient minor tribe in the Near East simply cannot be the "be-all-end-all" of... it all.
But hey, whatever floats your boat. I'm not here to judge, I'm just here to go off on tangents.
I ramble, therefore I am.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Urban Ranger
|
|
Apolyton Duke of Off-Topic
|
|
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
Urban Ranger,
Assuming everything except for 2 is true:
1, 4 
Don't apply to believers. Believers benefit by having others join. Same with fanaticism. |
Don't even get me started how Christianity recruits more believers. It attacks people when they are vulnerable, in a emotionally weakened state, caused by the loss of a loved one or a recent breakup. People who are normally invulnerable often fall victim. It's like a disease, attacks only those who are weakened. 
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
2,3 are more substantive.
3. The "feel-good" factor is the same as getting high from drinking alcohol or doing drugs.
Without the hangover? Sounds pretty good to me. |
If you need a drug or alcohol to help you escape from reality, most people think you have a problem. They don't realise it's the same with religion.
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
2. You are believing in a falsehood. It cannot be true until it has been proven.
Not so. There is a difference between something that is false and something that is unproven. |
I am not interested in a game of sematics. It remains a fact that A (idea, concept, thought, etc.) is not true until proven.
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
What standard of proof do you require? |
Okay. Start from what we know, construct a proof or argument to show that the Christan god exists. It can either be logical or scientific. Negative arguments won't work.
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
How many scientific 'proofs' have been rendered false when scientists acquire more data? |
Ahem.
Scientific theories aren't proven. They can acquire a variety of states such as "robust" or "sound" depending on the evidence garnered. They can be falsified, however.
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
Finally, how do you know that my beliefs are false? |
See above. They are false until proven. Otherwise, all beliefs are true, including Zeus, Odin, the Celestial Emperor, Ra, Umguf the Purple Unicorn, Ralph the Snake God, Brahma, the Ten Foot Hare, and the Giant Banana. Oh, and so is Santa Claus.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
those are two different things. Instead of saying "the same level" you should of just left it as "the same." I do agree with Cal that diversity is a good thing, and teachs tolerance and acceptance. In away diversity helps to define the true meaning of words like love, honor, respect, and friends instead of having them confused with words like lust, admiration, and desire.
|
erm...I think we are talking about two different kinds of diversity. I am referring to racial diversity on a global scale, not the forced racial diversity practiced in modern western society.
This quote explains my position on racial diversity fairly clearly:
"Hybridization of superior and dissimilar stocks is the secret of the creation of new and more vigorous strains. And this is true of plants, animals, and the human species. Hybridization augments vigor and increases fertility. Race mixtures of the average or superior strata of various peoples greatly increase creative potential, as is shown in the present population of the United States of North America. When such matings take place between the lower or inferior strata, creativity is diminished, as is shown by the present-day peoples of southern India.
Race blending greatly contributes to the sudden appearance of new characteristics, and if such hybridization is the union of superior strains, then these new characteristics will also be superior traits.
As long as present-day races are so overloaded with inferior and degenerate strains, race intermingling on a large scale would be most detrimental, but most of the objections to such experiments rest on social and cultural prejudices rather than on biological considerations. Even among inferior stocks, hybrids often are an improvement on their ancestors. Hybridization makes for species improvement because of the role of the dominant genes. Racial intermixture increases the likelihood of a larger number of the desirable dominants being present in the hybrid."
quote:
To me spirtuality is a following of a dogma, and it does not necessarily have to be religious. |
What is spiritual about following a dogma or practicing a ritual? Those are transient, material things in no way related to spiritual growth.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:25. Apolyton Time is 00:25. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|