 |
|  |
 |
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Spiffor
Drake :
It is arrogant in the meaning that you're convinced of the natural superiority of America, and do not question it. For example, do you know that EU is economically on par with the US now, and is as strong as the US in commercial negociations ? The only economic superiority the US still has over the EU is a much bigger high-tech sector.
"We have the largest economy in the world by a large margin." is now a false argument (the margin is small or tiny), but you still brag about it, and don't question it.
Maybe it is not really arrogance per se, but sure it is blindness. |
EU GDP - 6.5 Trillion
USA GDP - 8.3 Trillion
Not exactly similar!
Furthermore, the EU always has the French in there backstabbing the rest.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
darcy
|
|
Agathon, excellent post. 
I'm confident that under Clinton, the US could be where they are now (i.e. on Iraq's doorstep) without being regarded the bad guy by everyone.
Too many people here reduce international relations to power play, ignoring both public relations and international law. Contrary to the US, Europe still believes that international law is possible and must be strengthened.
It's often forgotten that not Schröder but Bush started the premature declarations. The first thing his administration declared was that Saddam must be killed. Of course nobody believes him anymore when he now comes with innumberable ulterior motives like weapons or al-Qaeda or other stuff. If he had hidden his true motives, as a smart diplomat would have, the majority of the international community could now support him in "disarming Iraq". Instead they are now forced to defend international law against the Bush doctrine of pre-emptive strikes if they don't want to lose their faces.
It was incredibly foolish to use adjectives like "evil" to characterize nations. Such kindergarden rhetorics achieve nothing but offending the people in the adressed countries and make listeners wonder how simplistic Bush's moral categories must be.
Putting Iran in the same category as North Korea was also very ignorant. How damn arrogant must he be to judge from thousand miles away whether Khatami has a chance to reform the country? He's the first president with real support from this people. Women were slowly starting to show more hair. And Bush ruins everything by spitting out his "evil" accusations.
Yes, he is as incompetent diplomatically as everybody expected an oil trader to be. Clinton was a lawyer, and it showed.
Last edited by darcy on 17-02-2003 at 21:42
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
First of all, I wasn't bragging. Someone asked how long I thought America would be looked to for money and said that I thought it would last for some time. You might have noticed that if you hadn't been so busy thinking of ways to tag me with the "arrogant American" stereotype. If you look for the bad in them, you shall surely find it... | Fair enough, I mistook this for bragging. The US will undoubtedly remain an economic powerhouse for a long time, and you're right it will be looked to for money, like the EU or Japan will still be looked to for money.
quote: Second, comparing the GDP of the EU and the US is stupid. The EU is far from being a united entity, so it is pointless to compare its GDP to the United States. The US is able to use its economic might in ways that a still-divided EU can't. | I didn't only compared the EU's GNP, but the strength of the EU in economic negociations. EU and US are of similar power in this arena, since the EU now speaks with one voice on all things commercial (there is no more national sovereignity on these matters, everything gets decided in Brussels).
quote: Not to mention that others have shown you that the gap between the EU and US is still pretty large... | There is still a gap, and the US economy remains slightly superior to EU's, but the US is not dominating the capitalist economy without rivalry anymore.
Btw, different ways to calculate GNP can do wonders : check this table (OECD), and one of the calculations actually places EU's GNP higher than the US', and Japan has only twice has less GNP than the 2 bigs. I'm not saying is table is more true or false than the other figures.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|