 |
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
If you have not already done so put the repayment offer in writing. Don't pay anything back until you get a written agreement from them to a schedule of repayments.
Try the local CAB, they are usually good on this sort of thing.
Check the small print on your car loan. If the vehicle remains the property of the lender until the last payment is made then it isn't yours and can't be seized.
Basically they are idiots who want the money back ASAP to cover up the mistake. Let them sweat. You have been a naughty boy but the judge is likely to be more irritated with them for forcing a court case after a reasonable offer of repayment.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
I used to work at Sheffield Polytechnic (a long time ago - they pretend it's a university now). The year end was either July or August. They also had a rule about closing the books on some courses six months after the end of the course. That one used to drive the finance assistants crazy as they tried to persuade certain lecturers to submit expenses claims before they were out of time.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:26
|
|
challenge them to a drinking contest. pray they arent scottish
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Buck Birdseed
Strange laws- what's given to me should be mine no matter what the reasoning behind it was. |
Not so strange. The idea is that a person cannot enrich themselves to the detriment of another if they "snap up" an offer that is clearly a mistake. If a car dealer gave you a sale contract with a zero missing throughout so the car was sold for 3, 000 instead of 30,000 , do you think you should have been able to enforce that?
Provost has no legal grounds to retain the money but I remain of the opinion that legal action is unlikely and of no benefit to the university. It appears that he has nothing that could immediately satisfy a judgement so a judgement would only get them periodic payments as has already been offered.
Laz,
Theft? Highly unlikely, unless your statute is incredibly different than others I have seen. He is no worse than a business that is unable to pay a bill they legitimately owe . . . or are those folks considered to have committed theft as well??
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|