 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:26
|
|
The problem with Tucker is he goes nuts at the wrong time. In the game against Ottawa, Toronto still had a chance with the score 3-1 and 10 minutes left, but Tucker screwed everything.
The Nolan trade is the type a team has to do if they want to try for the Cup. They gave up two great prospects, but they get a great power forward.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:26
|
|
The Leafs still have no hope of winning the cup unless they can get at least two really solid defensemen. Right now, their defense blows, and you can't go all the way with that. Once you get deep into the playoffs, defense rules. Regardless, I'll still put my money on any team that comes out of the West - it's just such a superior conference.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
The favorites are still the Red Wings, the Avs, the Devils, the Leafs, and--maybe--the Stars.
I put the Canucks a tier below these teams; they might very well be the most talented and exciting team in the league, but goaltending will remain a question mark in the playoffs until Cloutier shows he can win.
Now, one could say the same thing about the Stars with Marty Turco. However, I watched Turco as a four year starter with the University of Michigan, including a couple of NCAA titles. The man in CLUTCH. In four years at U-M, he never--and I mean, never--lost a game in which he went into the third period with a lead. I believe his record was 103-0-2 when leading after two periods. That's insane. I don't know if he will translate that level of success to the NHL playoffs, but I'd be a fool to bet against him. If I had to pick a team to win it all right now, it'd be the Stars.
It hurt to type that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:26
|
|
quote: The favorites are still the Red Wings, the Avs, the Devils, the Leafs, and--maybe--the Stars. |
Yes, yes, yes, no, yes.
quote: I put the Canucks a tier below these teams; they might very well be the most talented and exciting team in the league, but goaltending will remain a question mark in the playoffs until Cloutier shows he can win. |
Whaaa? How can the Leafs be a major contender (with their poor attitude and lacklustre defense), while the Canucks are relegated to "second tier"? Cloutier is a fine goalie. Young, but quite solid. I'd trust him more than Theodore. But that's just my opinion, I suppose.
But for overall Cup favourites, I've gotta say the Avs at this point. They're coming on strong when it's needed most, and the simple fact that they've got Sakic, Forsberg, Blake, and Roy on the same team is enough to make them a serious threat, in my eyes.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Agathon
The wings won't win because Joseph just isn't good enough when things get bad. The Leafs have already discovered this. Part of the reason that Joseph looks good is that he pulls off spectacular saves, however, the reason he has to make such saves is because his positioning is bad.
Joseph is a good goalie but when the game reaches a certain level he is a liability. I reckon Vancouver will chew up the west. But for a lapse in concentration and then confidence from Cloutier last year I think they would have won the cup.
Anyway, the Leafs have a good chance of making it to the final because they are the toughest team in the east. They almost made it to the final last year with one hand tied behind their back - I predict they will grind their way to the final, but will probably not have enough left to beat Vancouver or Dallas, one of whom they will probably face. |
I agree with the assessment about Detroit, although with all the other talent on that team, and with a solid number 2 (should he be number 1?) goalie in Legace, you can never really count them out.
As for the East, I'd actually say that Philadelphia is the toughest team, but they're always a wildcard in the playoffs. The last couple of years, they've been brutal. At the same time, they have the ability to smoke just about anyone. Personally, I'll go with New Jersey (shudder) to come out of the East. Although, if Ottawa can avoid/beat the Leafs, I might bet on them.
As I said, I love Vancouver in the West, but my gut feeling is that they'll make it to the second round and get knocked out. I hope that isn't the case, but I'm worried about their offensive depth. My money is on Colorado or Dallas.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
Bah. Screw fighting. Interesting sideshow? Sure. Essential to the forging of a team's success? Very, very rarely. I can't think of a single Important Fight, other than Darren McCarty's punishment of Claude Lemieux. ****er had it coming.
As to why I think Toronto has a better chance than Vancouver--it all comes down to Crazy Eddie. He's a proven playoff goalie. There's every possibility that he'll lose his mind and somehow cause the downfall of the Leafs, but at least he has been to the mountaintop. Cloutier hasn't gotten out of the first round. However, I'd be stunned if that didn't change after this year's playoffs--even if the Avs catch the Canucks, there's no way the Blues will be able to beat Vancouver in a seven game series.
The only possible way Vancouver loses in the first round--the Avs pass them for the division title, and the Blues pass the Red Wings, leading to another Detroit-Vancouver series. Any other situation, the Canucks get to at least the second round. How far they go after that sits on Cloutier's shoulders.
--------------
Okay, here are a few questions:
The red line--should it stay or should it go?
Overtime losses--sure, the extra point leads to more exciting play in OT. But a loss is a loss; at least it should be. How about this: three points for a victory, one point for a tie, and overtime returns to 5-on-5?
Contraction--the NHL is deep in the red. Should it contract a few franchises to stem losses and increase quality of play?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:26
|
|
Brashear was pretty much the undisputed champ for a few years, but I think he may be starting to wind down a bit. Laraque is a freakin' monster - he's listed at 6'3" (thought he was taller?) and 250lbs. It's hard to tell who the current champ is, since fighting in general is down this year.
As a team, again I'd go with Philadelphia. They always seem to try to have the biggest, toughest team in the East if not the league. Vancouver has one of the bigger and tougher teams in the West, actually, so tonight's game should be a good one.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Guynemer
Okay, here are a few questions:
The red line--should it stay or should it go?
Overtime losses--sure, the extra point leads to more exciting play in OT. But a loss is a loss; at least it should be. How about this: three points for a victory, one point for a tie, and overtime returns to 5-on-5?
Contraction--the NHL is deep in the red. Should it contract a few franchises to stem losses and increase quality of play? |
Red Line - keep it. Introduce no-tough icing, though.
OT losses - I think the system works well the way it is. Those calling for a shootout are out of their minds, and most hockey experts agree that 4-on-4 creates much more exciting play than 5-on-5. I may consider lengthening OT from the current 5 minutes, but it does keep the games a respectable length.
Contraction - perhaps, although not totally necessary, IMO. The league did make a collosal mistake expanding into rediculous markets like Atlanta, Florida, Tampa Bay and a couple of others, but I think the league overall can handle it. The biggest problem with contraction is that the cities most likely to lose their franchises aren't the ones that should. Currently, the teams on the bubble would be Pittsburgh, Buffalo and Ottawa (maybe Phoenix), but Atlanta, Florida and Carolina are the teams that really don't make sense.
A salary cap, on the other hand, is desperately needed.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:26
|
|
I agree with Kontiki mostly.
A salary cap is needed. Hopefully it'd even things out a little. I don't think I could fathom a hockey league with teams in Atlanta and Florida, but not Edmonton and Ottawa.
4on4 OT works fine, in my opinion.
The red line should stay. Cherry-picking and constant breakaways are not my idea of good hockey.
As for fighting: Blah. Not an important part of the game. They could outlaw it, for all I care. I much prefer the powerful, legal bodychecks to the punches. I do like Laraque, though... Not because of how he fights, but because of how he handles the puck in the opponents' zone. He can keep that thing on his stick with one hand, while fending off a 200lb defenseman with the other, and still make a decent pass out into the slot.
The problem is, there's usually no one there to receive the pass, because his linemates have unpolished positioning skills.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|