 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
SuperSneak
|
 |
In the land of the one-eyed
Jun 2000 time: 21:26
|
|
Here's an interesting article for the grammarians.

quote: Shifts in Linguistic Surface Structures Lead to Different Paths of Association at the Level of Deep Structure.
Like many of the linguistic patterns defined by NLP, the concept of transderivational morphology comes from exploring the intuitions of native speakers. We have many unconscious intuitions about suffixes and prefixes as native speakers of our language. Native speakers of English, for example, will recognize "peaceful," "happiness" and "contentment" as well-formed words referring to a related group of positive emotional states. Part of the construction of the words includes well-known suffixes in English: "ful," "ness" and "ment." If the suffixes are switched around, however, the words will sound strange. "Peaceness," "happiment" and "contentful" seem like they could or should have meaning, but they are unusual.
Try playing around with words like Communist, Capitalist, Freudian, Christian, programmer, and practitioner. Switch around the endings and notice how it affects you: e.g., Communian, Capitaler, Freudist, Christer, programmist, and practitian.
From an NLP perspective, various affixes (prefixes and suffixes) could be considered to operate as types of 'verbal submodalities'. In fact, shifts in affixes are often highly correlated with shifts in the submodalities of the non-verbal portion of the inner representations associated with the word. For example, adding "ing" to a word, often results in the addition of the submodality of movement to whatever inner representation a person has for that word. Take words like "hand," "sled," "flower," "bite," or "sleep," for instance. Our initial representation of the experiential 'deep structure' to which these words refer is most likely an image or sense of some static object or event. Adding "ing" to produce "handing," "sledding," "flowering," "biting" or "sleeping," typically immediately brings in or increases a sense of movement with respect to the inner representation.
Try this out with some other words; such as "rock" --> "rocking"; "smile" --> "smiling"; "e-mail" --> "e-mailing"; etc. Notice how adding the suffix alters your internal representations.
It is also interesting to do this exercise with respect to words that we do not typically associate with the ending "ing." Think of some words like "phobia," "cancer," "victim," "problem," etc. Add the suffix "ing" and notice how your perception of the experiences or phenomena to which these words refer changes (i.e., "phobing," "cancering," "victiming," "probleming"). It is probably different than the way you normally think about it. It may even prompt you to smile or laugh, because it seems incongruous or unusual.
One of the main applications of 'transderivational morphology', in fact, is to shift our internal response to key words that constrain or limit us, by playing with the structure or morphology of the word. In the following exercise, for instance, words associated with problem states are "defused" by substituting alternative prefixes and suffixes. |
http://www.nlpu.com/Articles/artic27.htm
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
ColdWizard
|
|
the edit rule is 5 min, iirc
|
|
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
The phrase was "due to the unavailability of..." a person. |
As the Doctor said, it's unavailability, and it's regardless of the context. As the article that Sneak posted touches on, there are all sorts of ways of achieving the same thing with different prefixes - unavailability; imprecise; disrespectful, et al. That's usage for you.
Last edited by finbar on 12-03-2003 at 05:59
|
|
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ColdWizard
the edit rule is 5 min, iirc |
Yo, CW! How they hangin'? Is it a timer thing? When I've been updating statistical posts, I've edited numerous times within 5 minutes and the dreaded phrase has appeared, seemingly, triggered by the number of edits.
Edit. Mmmm. I just tried it on the other post. One edit, outside 5 minutes, the dreaded phrase appeared. Same with this one.
Bow down to CW!
Last edited by finbar on 12-03-2003 at 06:02
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|