 |
|
tonyhaug
|
|
Columbia, MD
Nov 2001 time: 00:26
|
|
Instead of Civ II you should go all the way back to the original Civ (DOS based). Now that was a game!! I played that one exclusively for two years. Totally addicted! Of course, back then good games were few and far between. The only other games that could compete were Dark Forces and Doom II. Warcraft was still 3 years away and Quake was only a John carmack dream.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Azeem
|
|
No. CivI is copy protected.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maquiladora
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tuomerehu
You mean the questions about research-advancing? They're easy, if you've played the game. |
No he means its not free, even though it has been abandoned and no longer produced.
civ3 will never replace CivII as long as it cant support proper scenarios and customizability. Theres just too many CivII scenarios for it to be replaced by civ3.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MPatton
|
|
Houston,TX
Mar 2003 time: 05:26
|
|
Why I like civ 2 better
Yeah well I love Fundamentalism.
why
every city can build 10 units before requiring support
tithes
no corruption
no war weariness
no be successful min tax rate and max science lol like you need more money with this gov cause with it you are running a Religious, warmongering, Bill Gates government
Have many cities and fully develop them
With fundementalism bigger is better
I could care less about culture and hate being disposed
So any highly cultural enemy gets razed. I play as a monarch gov.
Ps. Is it possible to warmonger with democracy?
When I played the WW2 scenario I would immediately revolt the US into fundamentalism
CiV III just adds better graphics and more units like UU and modern Armor. And advantages of one civ to another
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|