 |
|
John-SJ
|
|
Silicon Valley, USA
Aug 1999 time: 21:26
|
|
quote: Originally posted by War of Art
Grumbold - I think you've got it! I've never noticed this, but dammit you're right! Yes its not perfect, but what (apart from MoO2 perhaps) would most people say was a better space 4X TBS game? Hmm?
-Jam |
That's easy, Stars!, by a mile!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:26
|
|
Honestly, I think it's a problem when you have to work hard to finally start to enjoy a game. I've been through about ten full games already, and I'm still honestly not having that much fun.
By the tenth game of Civ3, I'd stopped hating the changes so much (unless I found out that I didn't have coal and aluminum on my home continent).
I don't mind macromanagement all that much. But really, Moo3 makes it very hard for me to figure out if my changes really are affecting anything.
Ten games, and Moo3 just isn't all that fun. Entertaining, yes, but it's not going to stay on my hard drive as long as Moo2, Civ2, SMAC/X, or CTP2 did. Probably not even half as long.
I think it's more an acquired taste.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
Yes I know how you feel, I dont play MOO3 now at all, I did at first, but I have no urge or drive to play it, I am not addicted to it as I was with Civ3, and I played that for a long time and still do from time to time when I have the time. MOO3 just should not have been made.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:26. Apolyton Time is 00:26. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|