 |
| |
|
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003
time: 14:27
|
|
Yeah, but the decision was about balancing production, credits and tech considerations 8 turns into the future. If you don't consider it holistically then we could lose a few ECs down the track.
And if you consider we're selling articles for 1 EC each. Then that's a huge amount of work we're saving for those poor writers by spending 2 hours calculating the future production and energy distribution needs.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002
time: 05:27
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Maniac
Oh really? That would certainly be interesting!   |
Thats what i thought. I was thinking of e-mailing the Russian Government and asking if I could go there to study/work with them for a couple of months. Either that or go to study Scandanavian economies to see if the American's are right and public services stagnate economies. I keep being told that in topping the human development index they are wrecking their future prosperity, and I'd like to see if there is any truth in it.
quote:
Originally posted by Maniac
But before you leave, should you do it, do tell me what your opinion is about the fall of communism and the way the conversion to free market was done. |
I'm glad it happened, but a little unsure about how it was done. I think a market in some sense brings efficiency and prosperity, but I think it needs to be bought in as quickly as possible (a la Czech Republic). The shock is great, but short-lived, wherea changing like Russia brings bigger problems. I think a lot of the post '89 economic problems are down to the old system, such as the virtually 0% inflation for 40 years, which caused mass inflation when they removed their controls. It takes time to change, for instance the UK is prosperous now because of Thatcherism. It may have been bad having to endure it, but the freer market it brought means we have more prosperity now.
quote:
Originally posted by Maniac
It seems many people change their opinion about that after visiting those countries. They start out with ideals about the glory of free market and inefficiency of the state, and come back recognizing that the state should always remain strong to prevent all sorts of abuses. |
IMHO it is the state in a free market that performs much of the abuses. I agree that there needs to be some constraints on it, but I think it is far more efficient and prosperous now than it was 20 years ago. There is a big shock involved in changing, but I think over the long term tht becomes a lot less important. I think in 20 years Eastern Europe will be grateful that it changed, as I don't think the shock has disappeared yet.
Quite simply, in terms of economic prosperity, Eastrn Europe has gained from changing. There is more money (PPP measurement as well as exchange) in total there. The spread of money, the equality, I am not sure about. There is probably less at the very top (ie. government corruption), less at the bottom (worker's - no longer full employment) but a lot more in the middle (Bourgeousie). I will have to do some research on it first.
I believe in a free market, but one with strong public services, a welfare state, and strong environmental regulations. Think of Scandinavia, but with a little less tax and a lot less employee regulations.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Hercules
|
 |
in Tir Na Og
Sep 2002
time: 05:27
|
|
Much more interesting to visit China. A country, a nation, going through an extraordinary period of change (well when was it not). Now in the early throes of opening up to the WTO agreements.
Yes it has widespread in-efficiencies (like I suspect a lot of countries have); it has its societal strata, but it has no severe levels of poverty. And the overall standard of living seems to be well above (personal unscientific view) African and South American levels.
The book I read on my travels was Ferdnand Braudel's History of Civilisations.
If you are not familiar with his work, then for my money he was the foremost European Historian/Sociologist/Geographer of the 20th century.
The History of Civilisations was a development of a series of lectures from 25 years ago ( now updated, with scholarly comments to reflect new findings) and demonstrates a breath of vision spanning centuries and millenia that few scholars, in the modern era would dare undertake.
In all my years I don't believe I have witnessed such a thing as a free market in anything. I have witnessed price fixing, subsidies, monoploy, cartels, insider dealing, bribery, corruption ( widespread in the EU, as elsewhere ), in-efficiencies, political interference, trade barriers, exploitation of cheap (you know the well known Brand examples) child labour.
I 'd better stop.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Drogue
|
|
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002
time: 05:27
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Hercules
In all my years I don't believe I have witnessed such a thing as a free market in anything. I have witnessed price fixing, subsidies, monoploy, cartels, insider dealing, bribery, corruption ( widespread in the EU, as elsewhere ), in-efficiencies, political interference, trade barriers, exploitation of cheap (you know the well known Brand examples) child labour. |
There isn't such thing as a free market. There are freer markets though. Perfect competition (a free market) is just an idea.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27.
Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
19-08-2003 01:29
A year out could be good, retake A levels, keep working where I am (County Council's Strategic Finance Department) and go travelling for a couple of months in the summer. I fancy going to Eastern Europe to study the effects of the fall of communism.
I fear it might end up in 
and 
. 
|