 |
|
Kontiki
|
|
Canada
Aug 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
I'm curious: Were pitchers, on the norm, always useless batters? In my lifetime, there are only a few decent hitters that stick out, while the vast majority probably couldn't get a base hit off a t-ball stand. What about back in the good ol' days of the 40's, 50's and 60's? Or even before
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:27
|
|
I've always found it interesting that , with rare exceptions, pitchers hit like crap. If you look at world class fastpitch softball, pitchers are often some of the best hitters, and in fact, many play a position when they are not pitching because they are good fielders and hitters. In softball, there is often a DH but they are as likely to be batting for some other infielder as the pitcher.
I'm a little suprised that there is no one in baseball that is good enough to be a regular position player and pitch as well.
For me, no DH . . . pitchers should learn to hit . . . . and managers SHOULD face the agony of whether to lift their ace when trailing 1-0 in the seventh and with a runner on base
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Richelieu
|
|
Gatineau
Dec 2001 time: 00:27
|
|
Either you remove the DH or you do the same as in Football: an offense and a defense taking turns on the field.
I'd prefer getting rid of the DH though.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rex Little
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kontiki
I'm curious: Were pitchers, on the norm, always useless batters? In my lifetime, there are only a few decent hitters that stick out, while the vast majority probably couldn't get a base hit off a t-ball stand. What about back in the good ol' days of the 40's, 50's and 60's? Or even before | Pitchers have always, at least since the start of the 20th century, been selected for their ability to pitch; any batting ability they have is and was incidental. As a group, therefore, they've always batted about as well as any randomly selected group of young men with some athletic ability. That is, not nearly as well as professional hitters whose talent is at the top of the scale. Pitchers' hitting statistics have probably declined somewhat, as the quality of pitching is much better than it was in the early days.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:27
|
|
omar visquel then?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rex Little
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Calc II
I say if we're gonna allow pitchers to avoid facing the plate, might as well as make the entire field player have the same kind of options.
| Like I said before, the difference between pitchers and other players is that for non-pitchers, there is already a tradeoff being made--offense vs. defense--when deciding who will be on the roster. Rey Ordonez, pathetic as he is, is a better hitter than the average pitcher by at least 50 points; if that weren't true, he'd be gone even if his glove was really as good as its inflated reputation. A full offense-defense "platoon" system would make that tradeoff unnecessary, and would therefore be a much more radical change than the DH.
The DH does affect game strategy in obvious ways, but it does nothing to the selection process for pitchers. Teams have been choosing pitchers with absolutely no regard to how they can hit for at least a hundred years.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
I'm only 25 years old, spent my entire life in a American League market, one that until recently made quite good use of the DH.
I HATE the DH. Can't believe the two leagues play by different rules... it is idiotic, and ruins the credibility of the game.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|