 |
|
Andrew1999
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
From were would an attack against Syria be based? Cause if you think all those non-democratic arab states that based our troops for this war will do so for another war, this one against Syria, well, then you have issues. |
Well, let's see. There's one country on the Mediterranean that's our ally and wants to go to war with Syria anyway and has done so successfully several times. Then there's that other country we've got a bunch of troops in to the east and south of Syria. I think between the two of them the US could get in, and none of that annoying "asking for access" nonsense.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
Oh yeah, go to war with Syria with the help of Israel. That would cure the whole terrorism thing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Andrew1999
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
Asking Israel's permission to go over them to attack Syria..yeah, why not just paint a "we are doing it for the Zionists" sign over the WH just so that the Arabs don;t have to make up too much. |
I think that would probably happen anyway. Turn it around: If the US attacked Syria (and Lebanon) I don't think there's much chance that Israel would sit quietly in the corner as they have during the fighting in Iraq.
BTW, I think attacking Syria would be a terrible idea; I'm just trying to show that it is possible.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
Its sort of more like a What if thread I guess.
If by some chance Sharon agreed to pull back settlements the question is what the Likud and other allied parties would do.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
spiritof1202
|
|
Syria also need to fess up to any chemical weapon labs or Iraqi Ba'athists stashed in their territory, also.
At this point though, I wouldn't be in favor of invading them.
I am a little tempted, though...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ted Striker
|
 |
United States of America
Jan 1970 time: 21:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat

You're not supposed to interject reality, you're just supposed to because (some) of the Iraqis are doing that in (some) parts of Baghdad, and all our problems are now solved, since we've given Iragi FreedomTM
Afghanistan isn't newsworthy, because the flash and bang are done with, and who cares about the dirty little details of what happens in crappy little excuses for third world countries?
This is the war on terrorism, that'll last as long as we say! We're liberating people left and right, so don't be party poopers!


In other words, don't expect anything other than the same old BS in US foreign policy in that part of the world. |
Well, you gotta admit though, with this Iraq thing FINALLY clearing out of the way, it's going to free up alot of other resources to go after these problems.
I believe the Israeli-Palestinian issue will be dealt with next.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zevico
|
|
Melbourne
Apr 2002 time: 15:27
|
|
Assad is quite similar, IMO.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|