 |
|  |
 |
|
Ben Kenobi
|
 |
McGregornobi!
Oct 2002 time: 21:27
|
|
quote:
What do you mean when you say evangelicals?
When I was a little kid evangelical was almost a sinonim(sp?) of Lutheran (the evangelical church), but now evangelicals are pentecostals and tv evangelists.
|
Plan Austral:
I belong to an Evangelical Mennonite church. They key factor in all Evangelical churchs is a focus on bible studies and on sponsoring missions.
There can be evangelical churches of all stripes, even Catholic Evangelicals.
quote:
If I understand correctly, we are talking about missionaries here. Don't forget missionaries are people who devoted their lives to bring people to the true god, and genuinely believe it is the ultimate good that could happen for these converts, for it is about the salvation of their immortal soul.
|
Spiffor:
Well, here's where you are wrong. This is a misconception towards missionaries that they are only concerned with the spiritual and not the physical well-being of those who they come into contact.
Now, I ask you, who are you more likely to respect, someone who helps you 'just because' or someone who does so with strings attached? I'd say the former. That's what a mission should be about, helping those who are not well off and then sharing the Gospels.
quote:
The missionary can accomodate the local religion to make the conversion easier, though.
|
Where do you get this from, Spiffor? 'Accomodation' can mean many things. Some missions will change traditions of worship to fit the people they are working with, but they cannot, by definition, accomodate everything. To do so renders the church as not Christian, and can greatly confuse people as to the true message of the Church.
Sava:
quote:
"You can have medicine and food, as long as you accept Jesus Christ as your true God."
While not all missionaries will be like this, a lot of them are. If they want to give aid, they should give to the Red Cross, or some other agency that won't try to convert people.
|
Where's the quote from, Sava? I would be very surprised to hear any Christian group, even missionaries, preach that they must become believers in order to receive aid.
BTW:
From the source provided:
"Both the Southern Baptist Convention and Samaritan's Purse, in contrast, combine relief efforts with evangelization."
What this means is that they will provide leaflets proclaiming Christ as Savior along with the food, and medicines.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
Spiffor:
Well, here's where you are wrong. This is a misconception towards missionaries that they are only concerned with the spiritual and not the physical well-being of those who they come into contact.
Now, I ask you, who are you more likely to respect, someone who helps you 'just because' or someone who does so with strings attached? I'd say the former. That's what a mission should be about, helping those who are not well off and then sharing the Gospels. |
I don't really understand the expression "with strings attached", but I'd say I'd respect an altruistic helper, rather than someone who helps me in order to fulfill his political/religious/whatever agenda.
If I had to choose, I'd prefer an organization with a political agenda rather than a religious one, because at least, with politics, I don't have to fear a supernatural punishment if I come to change my mind.
quote: Where do you get this from, Spiffor? 'Accomodation' can mean many things. Some missions will change traditions of worship to fit the people they are working with, but they cannot, by definition, accomodate everything. To do so renders the church as not Christian, and can greatly confuse people as to the true message of the Church. |
The succes of the Catholic Church came from the lack of dogmatism from its missionaries. As you put it, many have adopted the 'traditions of worship' in order to have a greater audience in the targeted tribes. This explains why there are so many differences among the traditions of the catholic world, especially across the continents : voodoo for example is a mix of Christianty and traditional African lore. That's what I called "accomodation".
Yet, it doesn't mean these missionaries didn't profess the belief in one god and his heaven.
quote: What this means is that they will provide leaflets proclaiming Christ as Savior along with the food, and medicines. |
Let's hope they write this in esperanto 
In the post-Saddam Iraq, the possibility of a strong radicalization of religious communities is not to be discarded. If such a climate emerges, these leaflets would be considered as a provocation by the religious people. I don't think it is time to pour oil on the fire.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by obiwan18
Look at it this way, does the person helping you receive any benefit himself from the help that he gives? Missionaries do not profit if they receive more converts, therefore they qualify as altruistic. |
Indeed, missionaries don't get any reward for helping. But their superior motivation is to bring people to the light. Yes, such a motive is extremely altruistic, because they risk being badly welcome for the salvation of others. But should I be on the recieving end, they would simply look like brainwashed zealots.
Besides, about all humanitarian associations who go to Iraq do it in a genuinely uninterested way, where the one and only aim is to provide humanitarian aid, nothing else. The red cross, the red crescent, Médecins du Monde etc. all go without a political/religious/whatever agenda. I think these organizations are infinitely more altruistic than missionaries' organizations, even though individual missionaries can be genuinely altruistic (I admit, I wonder if the red crescent is completely prselytism-free )
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
Iraq is a modern country thats had secular government for ages. I doubt it'll be much of a problem unless the evangelicals start drawing attention to themselves.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Zevico
|
|
Melbourne
Apr 2002 time: 15:27
|
|
I personally feel if anyone of any religion tried to convert me I would be insulted. How would anyone else like it if a Muslim cleric started knocking on doors trying to convert you?
obiwan, I think people would think better of christians if they toned down the proselytising (sp?) a lot (that is, have the focus be humanitarian, and if people ask about the religion you tell them about it, etc.). That way no one would go away with bad blood or be insulted.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|