 |
| |
|
| |
|
|
DeepO
|
 |
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002
time: 06:27
|
|
Randolph, I answered to you before, as I had done to asleep around the time he posted something similar, and I find it very good you bring it up again. I think you mention the one point where strat forum guys might have a serious advantage over 'the rest': communication. We don't play that much better personally, it's simply the communication that does it, and that (sorry Togas) makes us better then other teams.
In here, I don't have any problem asking 'stupid' questions, throwing wild, unworkable ideas into the open, because I know that nobody will get offended, and most of the times somebody notices, and takes part of the idea to a higher level. Sure, Nathan is (after Aeson perhaps) the best micromanager on this team, but he is not afraid to hear critisism, or receive suggestions, and this is what has brought us so far. It still amazes me that we are able to outsettle all other teams significantly, building a wonder for half the game in our 2nd best city, starting from a decent, not great position, and suffering 6 turns of disease (costing us 5 pop, seriously messing with our plans). (okay, I admit, we might have built a few more defenders along the way, a minor mistake of ours )
This is what makes GS so fun, I have learned more here the past 3 months then in the 6 months prior to that in the strat forum, which I hardly visit anymore -- also because I have no time for playing SP games. But what I learned is not so much about the finer details of Civ3, but it is about how to go out on wild ideas, keep re-evaluating them, and adjusting the moment something else looks better. It's about posting every single (possibly good) idea you have, before you decide on your own if it is worth it or not. Others will judge it for you, and by discussing it in team, you will need to explain why it is good, while trying to find counterarguments to everything someone else can say.
This discussion is what makes any idea well-thought, and exactly this discussion is what makes GS into a special team. Sure, score wise we probably have 10 of the top 100 Civ players in the world in our team (of which I count myself to, some of my games would certainly make it in CFC's top 10 score lists, if that is what you see as a good measure of how well you are in a game), but that does not really matter, if we really would be egotistical instead of teammembers we wouldn't have gotten this far, Vox would have killed us long ago.
This proves, for me, 3 points:
- All input to this team is welcome, and necessary. Without discussion, we would die.
- We are not special in any case, each team with enough discussion can match our personal skills, because as a team they will certainly beat any of our stand alone members. Seeing that many teams are faring less, one can only assume that they have not debated the game so much, because otherwise someone in their team would have spotted mistakes, and asked to correct them.
- Togas is clearly wrong on one point, but I don't want to explain that to him, he manages to offend us each time we want a decent discussion. We are not egotistical by far, as it would mean our undoing. It's very strange to see all these members, many of them (including myself) being at the edge of being stubborn, over-confident or even elitist, getting along so good, forming a super team, instead of a bunch of super individuals. On the contrary, the idea I get from RP is that Togas is a dictator in his own team, meaning that the reason RP is not doing as good as it could is because it drags it level down to the personal level of Togas, instead of using all talent present in his team. (it's not really correct, but it comes close).
We may be elitist in that we don't want to break up the team, and some of us hope that this team can do some more glorious stuff later, but not in the members we take on. Not once have I decided to take on a member because he would be good in-game, but of course, you need to know someone to let him in (or actually, you need to not 'hate' someone to keep him out). If you would apply now, you would still get a abstain from me, I haven't seen you once before this team started, and have certainly no reason to black-ball you. Plus, all new members are still welcome for all I care, we can use more people to keep the discussions going. As long as we don't grow into 50 members, which would break our concensus based decision making, we will do fine.
DeepO
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Dominae
|
|
DeepO, sorry to say, but you're missing the whole point (Togas' point).
Of course we (Gathering Storm) all get along, because we're all 1) "in the club", 2) similar in temperament, specifically our drive to win. Concerning number 2, just look at our "platform" ("to find the most optimal strategy to win"...or something like that), and tell me anyone on this team is not proud that we're the ones trying (and maybe succeeding) to be the best. Stating that our team internally displays a lot of teamwork and general "good feelings" does not address Togas' beef with us.
Overall, I believe the players on the other teams want to win. So I can very much understand that when one team sucks in all the talent (so to speak), and makes it their raison d'être to be "the best", it can be frustrating to be left out. And most people here would say "too darn bad!", but this is exactly the kind of attitude that everyone else is criticizing us for.
We're not humble. We're good enough that some humility would not be out of place. It would do us some good.
Imagine if the Dream Team would parade around every year, saying "We're the best in the world, can we conceivably lose?", "Look at France, almost none of their players can dunk!", or "Our star player is injured, we're not going to do as well as could this year". Etc. etc. The rest of the world would probably look at them in disgust. Which is why the players of the US Dream Team have been heavily coached as to how to act in press conferences, etc. Their strategy: avoid the topic as much as possible; play the game, win, shut up about it and go home.
The only reason (that I can think of) as to why this is getting us so worked up is that we've got something to prove. Before saying "that's not me", sit back and consider the truth of it. How would we feel if we lost this game (say, to Vox)? Are we rising to meet a challenge for the sake of fun and competition, or are we just trying not to lose, because it would be slightly more humiliating than we would like? Chanting the mantra "we're the best" can be a good exercise in positive thinking, but it can also be a refuge for the arrogant.
Let's win this thing, then pat ourselves on the back later, shall we?
Dominae
P.S: I fully realise that my comments will not be popular among many here (especially considering that I have not been contributing much lately). But, for myself, I'll always be more faithful to Apolyton as a whole than Gathering Storm alone. And I hope you'll all understand that I'm just trying to prevent the appearance of a rift (between "Strat Forum Gathering Storm" and the rest of 'Poly) where there need not be one.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Dominae
|
|
Another thing: personally I also am on this team because, in my esteem, it contains some of the best Civ3 players on the 'net. But this does not make me want to win more. Just because we all consider each other "good players" does not mean we have to live up to each other at all costs. I'll be just as interested in seeing how all these great players take loss than how they push themselves to win.
Dominae
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DeepO
|
|
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002
time: 06:27
|
|
Dominae, I don't disagree with you, but why is it contrary to what I said? I honestly believe that we do not have any special qualities, even if we may have a couple of the best players in our team. The thing I wanted to say is that it is team work that makes us good, not individual quality of players. And this is exactly where I think Togas is wrong: his team should not be any less as ours, if they would have the same kind of interaction as we have.
I don't consider us to be the best (well, apart from the mentioned drive to over-confidence I regularly fall victim to), not at all. But yes, we're here to win, like all other teams. We have, quite naturally, found a formula to become better then our individual skills, by communication. There is no reason why other teams couldn't do that, so of course we're not superiour then others.
The thing is, I don't see ourselves as the dream team, at least not like the US basketball one. We do not singlehandedly outclass everyone in this game, at least I don't. It's the team play that makes us good, and if other teams do not do that, I don't care if they lose, I won't feel sorry.
Look at Togas, for instance. He is feared here, for only the diplomatic damage he manages to inflict. We can't do that, nor do we try. Does that make Togas humble about his ability? On the contrary, he boasts all he can in the ISDG. Do we do the same? I've seen only one such discussion, and that was the discussion on how close we should settle our cities, in which we did 'stand on our stripes' (Dutch). Do we attack Togas for his personal skill? no... not once. So why does he find the nerve to do it to us? His team could be equally good as ours, if they plaid right.
BTW, nobody comments on ND, or on Lego, for the simple reason that both teams seem to have found the same balance as us. They too are teams, not individuals. I respect them a lot, and think that one of our 3 teams has the most chance of winning this game.
Last comment: it certainly is not easy for us to get along so well, I work in a highly 'intelligent' place, and if you see some of the backstabbing between professors and researchers, you would be scared. The moment you realise you might have something special compared to someone else, it makes communication a lot more difficult. In other teams, one or 2 leaders can lead a team, in GS that wouldn't work in 100 years, for the simple reason that nobody is going to accept authority if he thinks he can do better then the leader. For me, this is the only reason for our success, and the main achievement: getting along, and listening to others. And yes, maybe the strat forum has helped in that, as it too can be a high-testosterone place.
One last comment: We're not exactly humble, and indeed, that doesn't suit us. But again, seeing as we're not special, and other teams aren't humble either, screw them. I don't want to create any ridges between us and the rest of 'poly, but I'll be damned if we have to be pressed into the corner all the time, kissing Togas *ss to be allowed into the rest of the world. Are we really the ones causing rifts here?
DeepO
|
|
| |
|
|
|
DeepO
|
|
supporting Candle'Bre
Jan 2002
time: 06:27
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Dominae
Another thing: personally I also am on this team because, in my esteem, it contains some of the best Civ3 players on the 'net. |
See, that's the difference, I think. I don't see us as the best players, even if I fully acknowledge that many of the best known players are on our team. I didn't join this team because it had all this talent, I did it because I was asked by friends, and hoped to consolidate friendship with many more people. Call me naive, but that's my reason for joining, and only that.
Other teams have plenty of talent too, maybe less known, maybe less 'developed' into posting ideas, but there is enough talent on this game to fill 20 teams.
Of course I acknowledge that fast enough, GS looked to be the best competitor for winning this game, however in my first few posts in the public PTW forum, I already stated that one of the biggest problems with our team would be the conflicting opinions, and resulting discussions. I also feared, that when you decided to be less active in our team, that those discussions were part of the reason for your decision, and I didn't like it. Because, if it can remain friendly, the discussion is what saves us, and makes us better friends. And friendship is the reason to stay in this team, not the prospect of possibly winning it. And certainly not the idea to boast later to those unfortunate teams we were able to beat.
DeepO
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Randolph
|
 |
Burlington, VT
Sep 2002
time: 00:27
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Dominae
Imagine if the Dream Team would parade around every year, saying "We're the best in the world, can we conceivably lose?", "Look at France, almost none of their players can dunk!", or "Our star player is injured, we're not going to do as well as could this year". Etc. etc. The rest of the world would probably look at them in disgust. Which is why the players of the US Dream Team have been heavily coached as to how to act in press conferences, etc. Their strategy: avoid the topic as much as possible; play the game, win, shut up about it and go home.
|
A very good example of what I was trying to get at.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27.
Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
18-04-2003 23:45
|
|