 |
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:27
|
|
perhaps an ami source will do the trick?
quote: As none of you probably are aware, a series of Pro-America / Support our Troops rallies went on across the nation this weekend. As your humble and unabashedly Pro-American correspondent, I would like to share some numbers with you folks that I've worked up based on a quick scan of the internet.
...
Seoul, South Korea: ca. 100,000 people
...
The question is, considering the massive pre, during, and post-protest coverage the "anti-war" rallies of several weeks ago got in the national news (including instructions on where to meet and how to get there), why isn't the media pumping up these in a similar fashion?
(e.thePeople) |
a rally
and another person of korean extraction, saying pretty much what i've said is the root source for the anti-american sentiment
quote: South Korea is less clear. Older South Koreans are pro-America as expected, but younger generation seems to be leaning toward anti-American sentiments. Focus of anti-American sentiments in South Korea is not based on differences in idealism, but apparent imbalances in the relationship between American and South Korea. Whether justified or not, young South Koreans are proud of their country and America threatens that pride.
There are Korean kids who maintain detailed list of all the incidents caused by American soldiers such as rapes, beatings, and how the guilty escaped justice thanks to the mighty America. Passed through several people, these stories gets bloated and turn real ugly. Result is kids thinking South Korea is under the occupation of America. Bush's actions and words nudge that kind of thoughts further along their paths.
(Don Park) |
but, it looks like that won't be enough to convince you, either.
since nothing i've posted before seems to have.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
If NK uses nukes and our boys are losing, then what's preventing us from unleashing thermonuclear hell upon them?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drake Tungsten
|
 |
Knee deep in alien womyn...
Oct 2001 time: 14:27
|
|
quote: If NK uses nukes and our boys are losing, then what's preventing us from unleashing thermonuclear hell upon them? |
The threat of nuclear war with China? That might not happen if North Korea strikes first, but who the hell knows?
Not that I think the North Koreans will strike first. It's much smarter for them to try to conquer South Korea with their massive conventional forces and use their nukes as a deterrent to American intervention. The threat of North Korean nukes falling on Tokyo or L.A. would make the US think twice about getting involved on the Korean Peninsula (especially if moronic anti-Americanism in the South manages to drive out the US tripwire).
Last edited by Drake Tungsten on 25-04-2003 at 10:16
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Merciless
|
|
I don't think we will ever carry out a nuclear first strike, since our 2nd Infantry and SK forces are more than enough for North Koreans to handle.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
quote: Their primary aim is survival, and once the US won't do anything to them, well, they won what they wanted. |
If this is true, then why have the North Koreans been blackmailing the US for economic aid all these years? If they were primarily interested in survival, they would've announced their nukes long ago and would never have shut down Yongbyon in the first place.
The North Koreans are building nukes for economic reasons as well as security concerns. If we don't pay them to stop, they'll just sell the technology and maybe the weapons on the black market. That, along with ballistic missile tech, is the only thing the North Koreans really have that is of any value.
|
The most valuable thing they have to offer the world is their regimes non-existence. I hope it happens soon.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:27
|
|
quote: What makes you think that an American presence in Korea is going to keep Asia from going up in flames? The more I learn about East Asia, the more pessimistic I get about the prospects for future peace in that region. The ethnic hatred and nationalist fervor in East Asia is going to lead to an explosion of violence someday and I don't particularly want America involved in it. |
it's making you pessimistic? you were't before?
hell, even I never thought that there could ever be a lasting peace in east asia. an uneasy peace, yes, but not a calm, lasting one as seen amongst the countries in western europe or north america.
quote: A million people in first day sounds like something paiktis would write, and is as highly unlikely as 500,000 civilian casualties in Iraq. |
i can't imagine 1mil casualties, first day, even with as many arty placements that nk has. then again, seoul has a population on the order of 10million or so, in a land area half that of nyc, iirc.
some figures dating in 2001:
http://www.sri.or.jp/asia/7th/2-3e-Park.pdf
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|