29-04-2003 00:46									#31
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Use the in game naming system.
Then, if a minister suggests a name, let there be a poll to have it approved.
At that point, change the name.
Only allow ministers to select a name (one each, per term, with no cary overs, etc). This gives the ministers some recognition for their time. Also, it is not a requirement thay have to submit a name, and nobody is stopping them from asking the public for suggestions. It is the DM responsibility to do and organize.

I voted option 1 as that was the closest to this idea, but should have said 4 as it really is an Other...

	29-04-2003 18:33									#32
	Tired of ads?

quote: Originally posted by GodKing Use the in game naming system. Then, if a minister suggests a name, let there be a poll to have it approved. At that point, change the name. Only allow ministers to select a name (one each, per term, with no cary overs, etc). This gives the ministers some recognition for their time. Also, it is not a requirement thay have to submit a name, and nobody is stopping them from asking the public for suggestions. It is the DM responsibility to do and organize. I voted option 1 as that was the closest to this idea, but should have said 4 as it really is an Other...

Yes it is my job to organize.

Judging from the opinion poll here, and from various suggestions, I have decided on this format FOR THIS TERM, (ie, any future DM can handle it as they see fit):

I will take requests from Ministers FIRST, starting with the President and VP. Each suggested name will enter a confirmation poll, but it will take 2/3 public voting to overturn a Minister's name suggestion. If a Minister does not want to name a city (yours truly) that city will be named by the public. This should prevent any names the people absolutely HATE, but still honor the ministers for their time.

When all ministers have named a city, I am currently debating whether to go to assistants next, or save cities so that later administrations will have some to name. Suggestions there?

	29-04-2003 21:58									#33
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote: Originally posted by roadcage . This game http://www.cdgroup.org/forums/tbs/c...forum.php?f=109 appears to have just stopped playing. Which is fortunate as their position looks poor.

hi ,

, maybe they gave up , or they used it for testing , ....

have a nice day

	01-05-2003 15:46									#34
	Increase the size of your Attachments

I voted for option 1; I didn't get to naming a city myself in the last game.

Aidun

Last edited by Aidun on 01-05-2003 at 18:31

	01-05-2003 19:42									#35
	Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote: Originally posted by Aidun I voted for option 1; I didn't get to naming a city myself in the last game. Aidun

hi ,

, you should get one named after you

just to say thanks

have a nice day

	01-05-2003 19:59									#36
	Get a bigger avatar today!

quote: Originally posted by panag hi , , you should get one named after you just to say thanks have a nice day

Thanks Panag.


Aidun

	03-05-2003 03:04									#37
	Remove this text

I dont want any cities named "OurGoatsAreTrained2Kill" either.

	05-05-2003 02:10									#38
	Got spare money?

Personally - I like the Viking/Scandinavian names the game provides. I say stick with them. Let's stick to the Viking theme.

	05-05-2003 07:51									#39
	Increase Your PM Length

quote: Originally posted by Aro Please, no fruits anymore...!

No fruits? But we can use donuts canīt we?
And what about plastical fruits?
Now serious , I voted on 2, it is cooler IMVHO, we allow more people to give ideas, avoiding some weird - named cities like some cities of the first Civ3DG . And 3 is way too randomic, we need to have the flexibility to name cities after weird terrain features if we want!

	05-05-2003 18:46									#40
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I vote other, meaning Dejon proposal.

	06-05-2003 04:59									#41
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

If we are not going to use the Viking names - then I change my vote to #3 - the dejon proposal as well.