 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:27
|
|
WInston, I'm not 100% sure if we're in the same timezone (we're +2.00 GMT, geesh I'm not even sure..), but it's yesterday already. Yeah we will overcome it no problem. The problem is we're having troubles scoring. We have chances, lots of them, but we just can't score!
So we are more worried about it, because in tough games you need to have those little things going towards you.. can't miss too many chances!
I'm afraid we're facing Sweden in quarter finals.. would be a thriller to us, but it would be 50/50.. I don't like those odds!
Anyway, you guys have stolen pretty good games, first the US, then Canada.. .
So.. anything is possible for Denmark too at this point. So I wish you guys good luck too, you have already accomplished pretty awesome stuff.. but don't quit now, not yet .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
raghar
|
|
I wish somewhere else.
Oct 2002 time: 05:27
|
|
Well slowakians learned defence. They had nice attack already so it was neccesary for them to learn the second skill.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Winston
|
 |
Danmark
Mar 1999 time: 06:27
|
|
Pekka,
Agreed, no quitting! We still have to take on Latvia and Sweden, and maybe, just maybe, we can cause a bit of commotion yet.
Against Canada, perhaps we were also aided by the fact that the tie didn't actually make any difference to Canada. I read that they had to beat the Russians anyway for the group win, and they still have to with yesterday's tie. Now if Denmark had held on to the lead and actually won, it would have been much worse on Canada.
But it could also be that they simply couldn't get through our 5 line defense and past our goalkeeper who was once again on fire as you said, saving 42 of 44 shots! Either way, no complaints here.
Finland will get their scoring together as the tournament progresses, surely.
Denmark is GMT+1 and you Eastern Europeans are GMT+2, I'm quite sure. I just thought you played Thursday, but I see you had it in your post that it was Friday.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:27
|
|
I don't think so.. You see in quarter finals they play A1-B4 (first groups 1st against second group 4th)..
So if you manage to beat Latvia and all other games goes well, you'd be 4th.. you'd be playing our groups 1st team . That would be Czech or Slovakia.. I think we'll be 3rd in our group, so we'll be playing against your groups 2nd team, most likely Sweden or Russia.
it'll be a barn burner for sure!
Yeah, you got that GF and GA official meanings figured out for me, thanks 
The system itself is pretty good.. just like you said. Looks like you're playing against Sweden tomorrow. It would be huge to even tie with them, but a good game none of the less will be good. When your teams players realize they can play with the best (Forsberg etc) and give them trouble, they'll get that confidence they need to play against Latvia.. If even close lost.. It's still good, then they believe they can beat Latvia, and then it gets interesting. And if that happens.. and you will be against Slovakians or Czechs.. well.. it's quarter finals, anything can happen!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Winston
|
 |
Danmark
Mar 1999 time: 06:27
|
|
It has always puzzled me how Americans seem to take absolutely no interest in their national team in any sport, except when the Olympics are on - and even then, whatever amount of enthusiasm is built up, it's gone in no time at all afterwards.
And the same with the Football/Soccer World Cup. Every 4 years, a bit of enthusiasm from some people, but once the finals are over, no interest in building up/maintaining a team of importance and strength suitable for the country's size and potential.
In sports, it's like the rest of the world doesn't exist to Americans. Except in 'professional team' ice hockey where the existance of Canadian teams is acknowledged for the purpose of playing the Stanley Cup...
Last edited by Winston on 03-05-2003 at 09:07
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:27
|
|
People in Canada aren't following these championships much since most attention is focused on the NHL playoffs. Besides, these games hardly matter, except as a method to get your team playing well. The Canadian team is certain to make the quarters and then its single elimination games so everything that went before is pretty much irrelevant . . . It does determine opponents but with the increased parity, thats less of an advantage compared to even 5 years ago.
That said, it is almost certain that the medallists will come from the big 6 of Russia, Canada, Sweden Czechs, Slovaks and Finland. These 6 have taken every medal since 1997 (USA bronze in 1996) and all but one since 1962 when the US took a bronze). Everyone else would be delighted to just win a quarterfinal game and truthfully most are delighted just to get to play in one ( making the top 8)
For the top teams, there was always the debate over whether you even want to finish at the top of your group since players have a tougher time getting motivated for a supposed "easy game" in the quarters. The theory was that it was better to have a tougher contest to sharpen the team.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:27
|
|
Canada cared about the Olympics as did the US and the result was Canadian gold. Canada also cared at Nagano but Hasek stole the game (semis) with his brilliance and the team couldn't get it together for the bronze.
Canada cares about international hockey but the placement of the IIHF worlds during the NHL playoffs means that the very best players-- from pretty much all countries but more so from the elite nations, are not available. Its hard to get excited about the worlds when its not a contest of best vs best. Also , the gap between the best teams and the rest would be greater.
Note: don't get me wrong, there are a lot of good players there and some good hockey but it hardly elicits much in the way of bragging rights.
Personally, I'm not watching anything except highlights until the quarters when I will try to watch the games
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pekka
|
 |
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002 time: 07:27
|
|
You mean to say we beat you guys in Nagano? 
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Peter Forsberg IS the best player in the world right now? He is in the games.. so is Sundin and maybe rookie of the year, Zetterberg for Sweden. So I wouldn't say they are that bad.. Only one who scored over 50 goals? Hejduk.. plays for the Czechs.. etc etc list goes on.
But I know what you mean... people get really excited when quarter finals are played.. the first games are not that important, since they always go the same way, same countries getting into those games. And if we think about it from players view, if there was only one thing they could win.. everyone would say 'Stanley Cup'.
So sure, that means the most for the players.
And don't get me wrong, I follow NHL very closely, I like NHL more than any other league or tournament.
It's just that now I have two things to follow, good hockey in both, so I don't know why I should concentrate only for the other one.. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:27
|
|
quote: People in Canada aren't following these championships much since most attention is focused on the NHL playoffs |
That's true, in a way, but I think you may be undervaluing the interest in the WHC here. Sure, the games don't get watched too much, mostly due to their outrageously early times, but on the highlight shows, WHC highlights usually come directly after NHL ones, preceding basketball, baseball, soccer, etc. The WHC can't match NHL-style interest, but it's not in danger of being forgotten.
************************
Also, as for this tourney not being worth much, because it doesn't feature the "best of the best"... I suppose it's arguable, but I'd, personally, rather watch a Team Canada featuring Dany Heatley, Daniel Briere, & Steve Staios, than the same-ol'-same-ol' of Shanahan, Lindros, & Niedermayer.
It makes for exciting hockey.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|