 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Koyaanisqatsi
|
 |
of Maine paupers.
May 1999 time: 00:27
|
|
MS investment in Corel and Apple was for legal purposes only. It was quickly followed by a number of moves to push both to the side. It's just cheaper to pump a few hundred million into the competition than a few billion into the government.
As for competition...want to tell the story of OS/2 again? C'mon. Apple may be a closed box, but at least they're open and legal about it.
And for the record, yes, I'm in New Media, which is heavily mac dependent, but if I had my choice, I'd stick with PCs. But there's nothing wrong with Jaguar that's any worse than XP. It's considerably better, actually, if you're just comparing software to software. I haven't managed to break my NT4 uptime record with it yet, but then, it hasn't been out for that long either...the only time it's ever crashed for me was once when I intentionally was trying to create a kernel panic, and I don't really think that counts.
It'll be interesting to see what happens if the IBM switch actually happens. It might even push Macs ahead of PCs in my mind.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:27
|
|
I'm just pointing out the irony behind Agathon saying MS blocks off alternatives.
It is Apple, after all, who forcefully drove clone makers out of business and has total and complete control over the hardware and software, not to mention buying up software themselves whenever they like it, or ripping off open source projects and basing products on it (OS X kernel, Safari, etc).
Apple's far more protective and "blocks off alternatives" than MS.
quote: As for competition...want to tell the story of OS/2 again? C'mon. Apple may be a closed box, but at least they're open and legal about it. |
There was nothing illegal about the OS/2 story, it's just business. Of course, the one that's told on the net is recurgitated by Slashdot zealots and the like. You act like IBM is a small company that didn't know what it was doing. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Koyaanisqatsi
|
 |
of Maine paupers.
May 1999 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
[quote]It is Apple, after all, who forcefully drove clone makers out of business and has total and complete control over the hardware and software, |
Frankly, I think their product is better as a result of the control they've exerted. No, it may not be the most friendly thing in the world, but again, at least it was legal.
quote: not to mention buying up software themselves whenever they like it, or ripping off open source projects and basing products on it (OS X kernel, Safari, etc). |
As opposed, say, to IIS?
quote: Apple's far more protective and "blocks off alternatives" than MS. |
But again, at least they do it above boards.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Asher
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Nov 1999 time: 22:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by dv8ed
Frankly, I think their product is better as a result of the control they've exerted. No, it may not be the most friendly thing in the world, but again, at least it was legal. |
I would disagree with it being better, because it's crashed more on me than XP and I've used OS X a small fraction of the time.
The kernel is usually fine, it's Aqua and device drivers that apparently can't handle powerusers very well. 
And BTW, the only reason Apple's actions are "legal" is because of their complete ineptitude when it comes to running a business and gaining marketshare. If MS tried half the **** Apple did, they'd have been broken up 10x over by now...
quote: As opposed, say, to IIS? |
Are you talking about IE that's based on Mosaic?
I'm not sure if IIS was based on anything, but I also don't see the point. I never said MS never bought-and-improved, lots of their stuff involved around that (hell, even DOS)
quote: But again, at least they do it above boards. |
Do you even know how they ran the clone makers out of business?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Koyaanisqatsi
|
 |
of Maine paupers.
May 1999 time: 00:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asher
I would disagree with it being better, because it's crashed more on me than XP and I've used OS X a small fraction of the time.
|
Oh, well then........
quote: The kernel is usually fine, it's Aqua and device drivers that apparently can't handle powerusers very well.  |
Honestly, I've had a good amount of success playing with the internals of OS X. My only major complaint with it has been the netinfo database, which is a pain in the *** to deal with outside the GUI. And the desktop version of it has artifical limitations on the number of shares and users you can create, which I find annoying.
quote: Are you talking about IE that's based on Mosaic?
I'm not sure if IIS was based on anything, but I also don't see the point. I never said MS never bought-and-improved, lots of their stuff involved around that (hell, even DOS) |
No. IIS wasn't just based on Apache, it contains Apache code.
quote:
Do you even know how they ran the clone makers out of business? |
Yeah, I do. I didn't say it was nice. I said it was legal.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:27
|
|
I gotta say that I like both Mac and Windows.
If you want an operating system that takes away much of your power to control the computer, for the sake of useability, the ability to run the majority of games, and no problem with your data ending up in the hands of the American government and Microsoft, then run Windows XP. Its pretty, its childlike interface is very easy to use.
Mac is very well balanced. Lots of software available, looks absolutely stunning, stable, reliable, but still costs money.
It has been shown that proprietery code is inferior in terms of coding errors to open source code. As such, Linux and BSD is also a good choice. Concentrating on Linux, it is still harder to use than the above two, but now no harder to install and configure than windows 98/2000. There are many interfaces available, the big two being KDE and GNOME. Both are good, KDE is more integrated and perhaps easier to use for people coming from windows, but GNOME is less bloated, and is more intuitive for people who have never used a computer before.
Linux and other *nix's are famed for being stable, although OSX, being *BSD based, is also comparable. It gives a rock solid system that blows windows into the ground when it comes to security. Linux distros wont run much office stuff, but an "emulator" for want of a better word, called WINE is in development that already runs many windows apps on linux.
Linux is good, is playing catch up very fast, and to someone with half a brain, it is probably the best choice out of the three. Mac and WinXP require very little mental power, they look better out of the box, although linux DE's are fully configurable. They also run more proprietery software, notwithstanding the huge array of open source alternatives and new software.
I run WinXP for games, and Linux for everything else. I am happy, Im not in love with one over the other, I cant really see the point in this whole OS war. Microsoft is a big, bad company, we all know that, but I dont care, I want the best product for me. At the moment, for my needs, they dont provide that, as I have the mental ability to use all the power that Linux gives me to get stuff done that I could not in Windows..
One thing that is not in doubt, linux is rising, it is rising fast. Its great now, it will be better tomorrow. Microsofts' days as a monopoly power in the operating system market are numbered on desktops, already over on servers. Inertia and games are their only advantage, and the latter will be a Linux advantage within two years.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:27
|
|
$799.00
800MHz PowerPC G4
128MB SDRAM
40GB Ultra ATA drive
CD-ROM drive
$999.00
1GHz PowerPC G4
128MB SDRAM
60GB Ultra ATA drive
Combo drive
$1,299.00
1GHz PowerPC G4
256MB SDRAM
80GB Ultra ATA drive
SuperDrive
$1,698.00
1GHz PowerPC G4
1GB SDRAM
80GB Ultra ATA drive
SuperDrive
AirPort Extreme built-in
All models include a 56K modem, Apple Keyboard and Apple Mouse.
Mac OS X
All new eMacs now ship with Mac OS X v 10.2 Jaguar.
Built-in apps
These include QuickTime, iCal, iChat, iSync, DVD Player, AppleWorks and Mac OS X Mail.
Software collection
With the new eMac and Mac OS X you get top-of-the-line software that includes Quicken 2003 Deluxe, World Book 2003 Edition, Mac OS X Chess, Otto Matic, Deimos Rising and Sound Studio.
iPhoto
Download, save, organize, share and enjoy your digital photos.
iMovie
Making digital movies is just as easy and fun as using your eMac.
iTunes
The world’s best jukebox featuring iPod auto-sync, 10-band equalizer and MP3 CD-burning.
iDVD
Put your digital movies and photos in motion.(SuperDrive equipped model only)
Get the power, performance and value you’re looking for in an all-in-one desktop computer that’s as easy to use as it is to afford.
AirPort Extreme
802.11g AirPort Extreme delivers wireless data rate of up to 54 megabits per second (Mbps).
Bluetooth
Optional built-in Bluetooth connects digital devices wirelessly.
Fastest eMac ever
Up to 1GHz PowerPC G4 processor that blazes through Mac OS X applications.
Blistering 3D effects
The eMac features the ATI Radeon 7500 graphics processor with 32MB of DDR memory.
New SuperDrive
With a SuperDrive-equipped eMac, you can watch DVD movies and read and burn both CDs and DVDs. The new SuperDrive at 4x is now twice as fast as before.
eMac Datasheet
View warranty information.
hi ,
very expensive , .....
have a nice day
|
|
|  |
 |
|
panag
|
 |
MY WORDS ARE BACKED WITH BIO-CHEMICAL WEAPONS
Oct 2000 time: 07:27
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
quote: Macs = 5 Percent
PCs = 95 percent
Were winning BIG TIME
"95 out of 100 people prefer PERSONAL COMPUTER over MACINTOSH" |
This just proves my point. The best people in America are the 5% that use Macs. We will rule the other 95% who aren't worthy of using a Mac. It's an exclusive club I'm glad to be a part of. |
hi ,
in some places its 5 % , in others 30 % , .....
it all depends , .....
one is certain , a lot of people who hate macs for one reason or the other have neither worked on one or own one , ......
many people dont even bother to visit www.apple.com , .....
cause if they did , they would not be telling some old outdated problems that where fixed a long time ago , ....
intresting how civ on a windows ( huge specs ) takes longer then on the mac , ... same map , same set up , smae scen , .... yet the mac beats it with more then half the time
some people should read the faq ones in a while from apple , ....
have a nice MAC day
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:27. Apolyton Time is 00:27. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|