 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by SlowwHand
That's just tough if it was difficult, GePap.
Why is that solely OUR problem ?
The troops were prioritizing their own activity, and did so correctly. |
Its OUR problem because Bushies made it OUR problem. Our objectives were to bring freedom to the Iraqis, to usher in a better government, so guess what, public order was OUR problem and should have been up there in priorities. While getting rid of Saddam cost American lives it was by far the easiest part of the job and all those ministries that were lost, all the ill will created by our failure to restore order will prove to be problems for us in the future. We put ourselves into the mold of occupying power so it is OUR problem and OUR fault.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:28
|
|
What was left to be done? You still avoid gsmoove's arguement. Why was one ministry secured and another down the street left?
quote: 1-2 dozen sites?? Baghdad probably has 10 times that number of strategic intersections that had to be secured. |
And all those street intersections took priority over the finance ministry and its records? (without mentioning cultural sites)
quote: There is still a ton of things to be done before we can begin to call the place secue. Sure, more troops would have helped, but only marginally IMHO. |
So your basic argument is: we go in to change the regime, but no matter what we did, given that we were the oens going to topple the authorities, we could simply do nothing at all to replace them? well, isee a huge porbem with that. The Us has aready done 2 other large peacekeeping operations. We have experience with what would need to be done, but what they shoul have done was NOT done.
quote: That's just tough if it was difficult, GePap.
Why is that solely OUR problem ?
The troops were prioritizing their own activity, and did so correctly. |
Fault lies, as Ned stated, with the planners at the Pentagon, for not setting those priorities right.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by PLATO1003 Most reports also state that the city is, for the most part, restored to order.
gs, what is your point with these statements? Yes there are pockets of problems, but what you state as the overall condition is just the opposite. |
Your first statement is either completely false or your definition of order is somewhat different from mine. Every report I have seen speaks of widespread crime and lawlessness in Baghdad. Just today the new commander in Iraq announced that there would be major crackdowns on crime in response to the criticisms the administration has received, so I hope things will be much improved shortly. http://www.nytimes.com/2003/05/15/i...15CND-IRAQ.html
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gsmoove23
|
|
I should hope its becoming much more stable, but considering what it was before thats not neccessarily saying much.
quote: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3032579.stm
"It is my responsibility as the administrator of the coalition provisional authority... to bring security back to Iraq," Mr Bremer told reporters.
He said thousands of Iraqi police officers were back on the streets, and reinforcements were on their way.
Bremer - intent on eradicating Saddam's heritage
"We will be bringing considerable... more troops into the country - some 15,000 in the next two-to-three weeks - so we understand the importance of dealing with this problem." |
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|