 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:28
|
|
I think he means "pop" in the sense that it is a little "simplistic" (agathon correct me if I am wrong).
They may be a guitar band, but I could probably play better! Ok maybe not, but hey I'm close... I can now play all but the instrumental of Stairway to Heaven.
You look at music in the current context. For me, the first always has something of a natural advantage. I view in historical context, but even today, I think nothing compares to led zep, if they released Led Zeppelin I tomorrow, I'd still say they are unsupassed.
You say you think we have better examples? Care to provide any? And dont say foreplay *cough* coldplay, they are good, but monotonous, a little travis-esque, and rather boring. The guitar capabilities is hardly stellar.
"I just find Led Zep's solos are boring and sound unoriginal nowadays"
Latterly, that is because people copy Led Zep. Find the derivatives unoriginal. Besides, Jimmy Page, Jimi Hendrix, Clapton, Satriani, Slash, Harrison etc, in a class entirely of their own. I dont think we have anyone like that active today.
The instrumentals, as well as lots about Led Zep, work on so many different levels. From the poetic, to the metaphorical, even to the metaphysical (I have a weird mind). No other band does it for me like led!
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Buck Birdseed
|
 |
Khoon Ki Pyasi Dayan (1988)
Nov 2000 time: 05:28
|
|
Naw, but come on, what's the point of Rock? Classical music and Jazz have much more sophistication. Where rock excels is in rawness, in the groove, in the ability to get people up on the dancefloor, in the extreme hardness, in the multiple layers of memorable hooks, all areas where "sophisticated" music lags behind. Why not indulge in what makes Rock great? Or, if you want your music unmemorable, soft, pretentious and without any kinetic ability whatsoever, but revelling in non-human technical proficiency and advanced harmonics and melodies why not switch to Modern Jazz or Contemporary Classical Music? If you like that sort of crap, I'm sure Karlheinz Schtockhausen is well more intelligent than bloody Jimmy Page or Thom Yorke.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drogue
|
 |
Omnipresent conscience
Oct 2002 time: 05:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Buck Birdseed
Naw, but come on, what's the point of Rock? Classical music and Jazz have much more sophistication. Where rock excels is in rawness, in the groove, in the ability to get people up on the dancefloor, in the extreme hardness, in the multiple layers of memorable hooks, all areas where "sophisticated" music lags behind. Why not indulge in what makes Rock great? Or, if you want your music unmemorable, soft, pretentious and without any kinetic ability whatsoever, but revelling in non-human technical proficiency and advanced harmonics and melodies why not switch to Modern Jazz or Contemporary Classical Music? |
Because it's different. I don't call Radiohead rock. Their earlier albums were, but Kid A and Amnesiac? More avant guarde, or just generally weird stuff. I like that, I find it interesting, and enjoyable to listen to. Elevator music? I thought that was what Bach was for. Radiohead isn't what I'd class as background music. I like Modern Jazz (I play it) but I find it missing something at times. And Classical, I like big orchestral numbers, but often I find it boring and stuff that's good for background listening, but not something I want to listen to hours of.
quote: Originally posted by Buck Birdseed
If you like that sort of crap, I'm sure Karlheinz Schtockhausen is well more intelligent than bloody Jimmy Page or Thom Yorke. |
Well, I doubt that. Both Jimmy Page and Thom Yorke are geniuses in my book. Schtockhausen is pretty good,a nd incredibly intelligent with his music, but I couldn't say he was better or more intelligent.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
St Leo
|
 |
Member of the Apolyton Social Democratic Party
Jul 2005 time: 00:28
|
|
If we are talking late 70s/early 80s, I am going to have to go for Judas Priest (burnt a metal mix with Breaking the Law, Living After Midnight, and United yesterday), Iggy Pop (mmm, Lust for Life rocks), and AC/DC (more rock than metal IMHO, but loads of great stuff).
I've checked out War Pigs and Babe, I'm gonna leave you after seeing them recommended on Apolyton and was very underwhelmed. Metallica, like Bad Religion, is just meh for me; I can listen to their stuff for a while, but I couldn't name a single song.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
St Leo
|
 |
Member of the Apolyton Social Democratic Party
Jul 2005 time: 00:28
|
|
Uh, Def Leppard, Poison, Ratt, Motley Crue, and GNR all suck. Do you still consider me a glam rock type?
I listen to Nirvana frequently.
Metal bands I like a lot include Helloween, Gamma Ray, Freedom Call, Hammerfall, Rammstein, KMFDM, and Rob Zombie.
80s rock-wise, I've recently discovered Joan Jett.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|