25-05-2003 05:05									#31
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: Orange - your claims are poorly done. Assassination is really not terrorism. Terrorism is by definition aimed to terrorize the leaders by hurting civilians, not to remove them.

Since when does it specifically have to do with terrorizing leaders or hurting civilians? Terrorism causes terror. When senators were being sent letters laced with anthrax, it wasn't simply "assassination" attempts, it was terrorism. This is no different, especially since mail and parcel carriers could have been easily exposed as well.

As for Azazel hating Palestinians, this is just a friendly troll (hence the rolleyes), so you can ignore it

	25-05-2003 05:12									#32
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

A friendly troll is denoted by a winking smilie. A rolling eyes smilie has tons of meanings.

As far as terrorism goes- that's the difference between terrorism and guerilla. Terrorism means you aim at civilians. Guerilla means you aim at government / army. both lead to terror, but only one is terrorism.

Killing hitler = guerilla assassination.
Killing germans walking on the street = terrorism (unless by means of bombing the city, in which case it is somehow covered by war regulations IMO)

	25-05-2003 05:18									#33
	Tired of ads?

Siro - I contend that the means is more important than the act. Again, my bus scenario, that would be terrorism. Taking a shot at Sharon with a pistol would not.

	25-05-2003 07:03									#34
	Increase the size of your Attachments

quote: Originally posted by atawa If the Isrealis send Arafat a letter with Antrax in it why on earth are they complaning about the suicide attacks anyway?

I don't see anyone claiming Israel did it . The article states: "Mr al-Hassan said the package originated in the Far East"

(Though honestly, I suspect that, like the dozens of claims of Anthrax since the original incidents, it will turn out that it wasn't anthrax.)

	25-05-2003 08:15									#35
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote: Originally posted by MRT144 but i mean to suggest that arafat is solely responsible for all the problems with peace and killing him would change a lot is daft.

We will never know as long as he lives. Without him, how much killing do you think there will be?

	25-05-2003 08:31									#36
	Inflate your Upload Space

there might be more if hes assasinated

	25-05-2003 09:23									#37
	Suffering from ads?

It's true there could well be a Backlash, although this may be the price of achieving long term peace.

	25-05-2003 09:44									#38
	Got spare money?

It may not literally be considered terrorism, but if GW Bush received an anthrax-laced letter tomorrow, you can bet your bottom dollar the 'terrorism' card would be played like the ace of spades.

And, personally, I don't think making a martyr out of Arafat would do anyone any good. Let him die an incontinent, pathetic old man.

	26-05-2003 18:01									#39
	Increase Your PM Length

quote: Originally posted by Joseph We will never know as long as he lives. Without him, how much killing do you think there will be?

hi ,

if he and the key leaders would be gone , almost none , ....

his money should be given to the palestinian people

have a nice day