 |
|  |
 |
|
loinburger
|
 |
Sweet Sauce Jones
Jul 1999 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
I don't mean students shouldn't be able to ask questions, in fact every HS teacher and professor I have come across encourages students to participate in class. |
I've had the same experience with high school teachers and college professors (as I mentioned in my last post). However, prior to high school, the asking of questions was considered to be disruptive, and got me (and others, usually males) in a great deal of trouble and/or earned me the animosity of the teacher. This severely pissed me off at the time, and spurred me on to committing bigger and better acts of disruption. When high school rolled around I was able to switch gears without too much difficulty -- my acts of pure disruption went back under the table, while my acts of disruption-***-initiative were just as strong as they'd ever been. Others weren't so fortunate -- some had repressed their "disruptive" urges to the extent that they had trouble bringing them back to the surface in high school, while others had gotten so used to their (legitimately) disruptive lifestyle that they had difficulty switching gears. Both of these latter problems tend (in my experience) to affect males far more than females, for the very reasons cited in this thread -- males are less prone to sitting still and quietly twiddling their thumbs, and so they are more likely to be labelled (often falsely) as having disciplinary problems early in their educations.
IMO, if early education were more focused on, well, education, and less focused on discipline, then the disparity would be lessened if not eliminated.
Last edited by loinburger on 26-05-2003 at 10:06
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
I don't see a big gender gap here (teach at a law faculty). But there are some subtle differences.
Women have overtaken men in numbers, at least when it comes to class attendence. When I was a student, it was about 50-50. Now it's about 60-40.
On average women seem to learn better, probably put more effort into learning. In one class I offered a test case for practice - got a female/male participation ratio of 17:3 (!). I asked my male colleagues what on earth they are thinking - that they will marry rich?
Another odd thing is the disparity within the groups. Among the absolutely best, there's a clear male majority. Among the absolutly worst, there's an even bigger male majority. (that observation is supported by some studies, but I'm sure there are others to dispute it)
I don't see any particular structural advantage for women though. Seems men are really just more lazy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
TCO
|
 |
Richmond, VA
Jan 1970 time: 00:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by HershOstropoler
I don't see a big gender gap here (teach at a law faculty). But there are some subtle differences.
Women have overtaken men in numbers, at least when it comes to class attendence. When I was a student, it was about 50-50. Now it's about 60-40.
On average women seem to learn better, probably put more effort into learning. In one class I offered a test case for practice - got a female/male participation ratio of 17:3 (!). I asked my male colleagues what on earth they are thinking - that they will marry rich?
Another odd thing is the disparity within the groups. Among the absolutely best, there's a clear male majority. Among the absolutly worst, there's an even bigger male majority. (that observation is supported by some studies, but I'm sure there are others to dispute it)
I don't see any particular structural advantage for women though. Seems men are really just more lazy. |
Lots of people see this more extreme bell curve for males. I'm not sure how much is disposition and how much is intelligence. Some IQ studies show males with a higher standard deviation of IQ (but about the same mode). I've also noticed the female as more willing to take "coaching" type instruction.
Last edited by TCO on 26-05-2003 at 18:27
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Jaguar Warrior
They'll then be losers whose wives earn more than them.
I'm gonna make sure that doesn't happen to me. |
surely you arent serious
Last edited by MRT144 on 26-05-2003 at 22:19
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GP
Lots of people see this more extreme bell curve for males. I'm not sure how much is disposition and how much is intelligence. Some IQ studies show males with a higher standard deviation of IQ (but about the same mode). |
It could be modified by women being less likely to show off. I've seen the most competent women suffering from self doubts, while the most incompetent men were oozing self confidence.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
no, the whole thing about being a loser cause your wife makes more than you. are you planning on meeting your wife in the while, clubbing her, and then dragging her back to your cave to make little primates?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
man, im gonna be an audio engineer...theres no way im gonna make huge money.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:28
|
|
well, i do manage my money really well. but still i love having all sorts of recording equipment at home. thank god im moving more towards computer based stuff rather than hardware. although some day i will have some hardware synths.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|