 |
|  |
 |
|
Ted Striker
|
 |
United States of America
Jan 1970 time: 21:28
|
|
quote:
In May of 1969, Black Panther founder and national chairman Bobby Seale (who had already been indicted for his alleged participation in demonstrations at the Democratic National Convention in Chicago in August 1968) made a trip from Oakland to New Haven, Connecticut, to speak at Yale University. The Black Panthers were by then nationally known, a focus of media attention, and under the active surveillance of the FBI. (J. Edgar Hoover had publicly declared several months earlier that he considered the Panthers "the greatest threat to the internal security of the country.") Rumors of police informants and government spies having infiltrated the party were rampant, and a man named Alex Rackley, a member of the Panthers' New York chapter, fell under suspicion. Rackley was taken to the home of Warren Kimbro (a "community organizer and aspiring Panther") where he was held captive for 24 hours, beaten, and scalded with boiling water in an effort to force him to confess. Rackley was then taken to a marsh in Middlefield by Kimbro, George Sams (Panther field marshall and, according to some, himself a police informant), and Lonnie McLucas (a Panther member from Bridgeport), where Sams ordered Kimbro and McLucas to kill the suspected informant. (Who did the actual killing has always been disputed; McLucas reportedly fired the first shot, but Kimbro admittedly delivered the bullet to the head that killed Rackley.) Rackley's body was discovered the next day by fishermen, and fourteen Black Panthers were arrested and charged with murder, kidnapping, and conspiracy.
|
Think you omitted a few "minor" details.
They are no better than the clan.
THUGS
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/panthers.htm
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:28
|
|
I wonder why rumors of police informants infecting the party were rife? Perhaps because they were? Geronimo Pratt was railroaded for a murder he didn't committ and spent 23 years in prison soley on the word of an FBI rat, despite witnesses giving Pratt an alibi 600 miles away at the time the murder was committed. Mark Clark and Fred Hampton were murdered by police in their beds, using information a police informant had given them.
What I find interesting is that your quote only speaks of the Panthers being indicted, not being convicted. Indictments mean nothing.
quote: But hey a couple of bad apples shouldn't spoil the bunch right? |
Well heck, using this measure, the police are nothing but a bunch of murdering, torturing thugs, since, after all, the actions of a few are more important than the overall impact of the group. So, I expect you will be out at your local military base, screaming baby-killers at the soldiers. After all, the actions of a few are more important than the organization. I guess the Catholic Church is nothing more than a bunch of child molestors, and Muslims are nothing more than terrorists, etc.
But why let reality stand in the way of your hate-on?
BTW, snopes is not necessarily an authoritative source. It's a good read, but when they get in the realm of politics, they always tend to side with the official story.
Last edited by chegitz guevara on 30-05-2003 at 21:05
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:28
|
|
From the same Snopes piece . . .
quote: What has been overlooked (or deliberately ignored) in the piece quoted here is that even though fourteen Black Panthers were arrested and charged with murder, kidnapping, and conspiracy in connection with the murder of Alex Rackley, only two of them were put on trial (the others plead to lesser charges, or the charges against them were dropped): Bobby Seale and Erika Huggins. Why only these two? Seale wasn't present at either the torture or murder of Alex Rackley; he maintained that he knew nothing about any plans to kill Rackley and wasn't even aware that Rackley was suspected of being a police informant. (Panther George Sams did claim he had told Seale about suspicions Rackley was an informant, however.) Erika Huggins wasn't present when Rackley was killed, either. She was accused of having taken part in the "interrogation" of Rackley, boiling the water used to scald him and kicking him while he was tied to a chair. Certainly her actions were both criminally wrong and morally reprehensible, but several other Panthers took a far more active hand in the torture and murder of Rackley (such as those who actually poured the boiling water onto him, beat him, and shot him in the head). Why were only these two people put on trial while the other Panthers were allowed to plead out or weren't even prosecuted at all? |
Seale and Huggins were aquitted, BTW. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tingkai
|
|
To find the Northwest Passage
Aug 2001 time: 13:28
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ted Striker
Think you omitted a few "minor" details.
|
Yeah, and you omitted some big details. Like the fact that the guys who committed the murder were not put on trial. Instead, it was the Panther's leaders who were arrested and put on trial.
From the Snopes article that you cited:
Even though fourteen Black Panthers were arrested and charged with murder, kidnapping, and conspiracy in connection with the murder of Alex Rackley, only two of them were put on trial (the others plead to lesser charges, or the charges against them were dropped): [Black Panther founder and national chairman] Bobby Seale and Erika Huggins. Why only these two? Seale wasn't present at either the torture or murder of Alex Rackley; he maintained that he knew nothing about any plans to kill Rackley and wasn't even aware that Rackley was suspected of being a police informant. (Panther George Sams did claim he had told Seale about suspicions Rackley was an informant, however.) Erika Huggins wasn't present when Rackley was killed, either. She was accused of having taken part in the "interrogation" of Rackley, boiling the water used to scald him and kicking him while he was tied to a chair. Certainly her actions were both criminally wrong and morally reprehensible, but several other Panthers took a far more active hand in the torture and murder of Rackley (such as those who actually poured the boiling water onto him, beat him, and shot him in the head). Why were only these two people put on trial while the other Panthers were allowed to plead out or weren't even prosecuted at all?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28. Apolyton Time is 00:28. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|