 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
Boris:
where did Sava say this? I might have missed it...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001 time: 23:29
|
|
quote: What about welfare abuse though? there's plenty of people who make a nice amount of change under the table at jobs or they do semi-illegal or down-right illegal things but still collect welfare? with an emphasis on food stamps over checks though, things aren't as bad as they could be but abuse def is a problem. | Albert... yet another Myth...
quote: it is statistically rare | Correct.
quote: Myth: Welfare Families Use Their Benefits to Fund Extravagance
Fact: Welfare Families Live Far Below the Poverty Line
The belief that welfare provides a disincentive to work by providing a well-paying "free ride" that enables recipients, stereotyped as "Cadillac queens," to purchase extravagant items with their benefits is another myth. In reality, recipients live considerably below the poverty threshold. Despite increased program spending, the average monthly family benefit, measured in 1995 dollars, fell from $713 in 1970 to $377 in 1995, a 47 percent drop. In 26 states, AFDC benefits alone fell 64 percent short of the 1996 poverty guidelines, and the addition of food stamps only reduced this gap to 35 percent (Staff of House Committee on Ways and Means, 1996).
Despite the ready availability of facts, myths about welfare continue to be widespread. The media contributes to this lack of information. The media helps shape public perceptions about welfare recipients. The way in which a topic is reported can turn a neutral reader into an opinionated reader and can greatly influence public opinion. Although in an analysis of articles published in 10 major newspapers from January 1997 to April 1997, the tone was generally sympathetic to the poor, actual research and facts to counter myths were generally lacking (Wyche & Mattern, 1997).
Recommendations
Federal and state agencies should provide newspapers and other media with accurate information about welfare recipients and programs, including information on welfare reform.
Jobs need to pay better than welfare. Rather than focusing on welfare time limits, policy action at the state and federal levels must address reforming the low-wage labor market by raising wages and increasing the ability of low-wage workers to join unions and bargain collectively.
Public and private agencies should collaborate more effectively to promote and increase employment opportunities for women, especially of hard-to-place women.
States should provide training for case managers and other appropriate personnel to advocate for, support, and follow up with clients in ways that are not adversarial or punitive during their job search process.
States and federal agencies should fund and conduct research on the impact of the transition of mothers to work on the mother and the family and on what strategies best promote most positive outcomes for the mothers and their families.
States should require and fund formative and summative evaluations of proposed programs. | from http://www.apa.org/pi/wpo/myths.html
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
Sava:
no... thats not what i'm talking about... what about people who make 15 dollars an hour under the table so that to the US gov't they got no taxable income so they can collect welfare...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
Sava:
everywhere you go, no matter the topic, you somehow tie it in with corporate fatcats stealing money...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:29
|
|
Albert, its too easy
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:29
|
|
Dinodoc, its a lot easier to support individuals who have nothing than support corporations who have everything.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999 time: 00:29
|
|
Monkspider:
quote: corporations provide the fine products you buy such as Mr. Bubble brand bubble bath." |
that had me cracking up...
anyway, i think the status quo when it comes to welfare is probably the best. it is not especially costly (only a couple dollars a year from each tax-payer) and there are some more restrictions than a few years ago which cut down on the problems of welfare... the welfare to work program, while not perfect in that welfare recieptents' kids sometimes are left alone and they start acting up and doing ****, is still, basically, the best way to get people to learn how to fish.
i do think however that two main ideas will make welfare obsolete... more businesses in urban and especially rural areas (I wont front... rural alabama is far poorer than philly) would provide more jobs and really, i dont care what leftists say about wages or what not, give someone a full-time job and they'll do alright.
the other problem is such things as teenage pregnancy and drug use, which not only makes the individual poor but just about everyone around them. stop sex and drugs and there'll be some more economic stability among the poor and lower middle class
thanks
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|