 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bane Star
|
 |
Adelaide, Australia
Sep 2000 time: 14:59
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
First of all, since showing actual people under 17 (or 18 more likely) having sex ius a crime, if the actors were undergae, the director and othewrs would have been prosecuted already. |
If the movie is made outside of australia, then we have no jurisdiction to prosecute (well we do but its just too much work to do anyway) so its easier to BAN the movie...
quote:
The simple thing would be to give it Australia's equivalent of X or NC-17 and be done with it, instead of this. |
The real problem is the lax attitude cinemas have to movie ratings, the cencorship board knows full well that even with the harshest rating at least 10,000+ kids around the age of 9-15 are going to see it... parents are idiots these days, tied up with work and all that, they aren't parenting properly... What do you do.... tighten the rules or simply restrcit the movie in the first place....
I for one, say that Violence in all forms should be reduced and restricted and nudity made more relaxed and laid back... australia used to have a 80/20 relaxation about nudity, these days with the american cencored movies we get more violence and less nudity, and so our society goes more violent less nudity...
just my 3 cents
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Bkeela
|
 |
Brisbane, Australia
Oct 1999 time: 15:29
|
|
No, it's passionate advocates for incest, child sex and autoerotic asphyxiation as art that aren't too bright. Thankyou very much.
Last edited by Bkeela on 08-07-2003 at 16:16
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|