 |
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: The auto industry is an excellent example. Most cars sold here are now foreign. |
This is a myth, IIRC. AFAIK, we still outsell foreign cars by a wide margin.
quote: Is that good? The "debacle" you speak of was caused by an artificial "oil crisis" and the resultant rush to import cars which were perceived to be more efficient. It was not accompanied by an opening of non-US markets, and our auto industry is now dying. Chrysler is gone, Ford is going and GM is on life support. And you think this is an example of the success of free trade for US? |
It's a free market. If the Japanese are selling a car for x that I think is more efficient than the Americans selling a more expensive car for y, then I'll take the Japanese car, unless I'm a business moron. The correct way to save an industry is to make the industry good, not to keep subsidizing it into hell.
Then again, one of the best things the government could do right now for the auto industry is subsidizing...give it money for the specific purpose of getting off its lazy ass and building a ****ing hydrogen car. And then, poof, no more middle east meddling...
(And the instances of examples in this thread are manufacturing examples; i.e. steel closing down and cars closing down. America is moving to a service economy.)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
optimus2861
|
|
Halifax, NS
Nov 2000 time: 01:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
Considering the number of countries that banned Canadian beef after that cow was discovered, why would they be pissed off at us? |
Because you're basically siding with the Japanese on this issue instead of with us. Instead of telling the Japanese in no uncertain terms that North American beef is safe, that country-of-origin labelling is unfeasible and that both Canada & the USA have top-of-the-line safety standards in place, and therefore the USA will reopen its borders to Canadian beef immediately and if Japan doesn't like it, tough; you're hemming & hawing on those unreasonable Japanese demands and none of us up here can figure out how you benefit by punishing our beef industry for something that could just as easily have happened to you.
Then you toss in the softwood lumber dispute, the wheat tariff, and the perception is that the USA doesn't want to trade fairly with Canada in industries where Canada can actually *gasp* compete! And/or that the USA will bow to demands from other trading partners instead of from your largest trading partner with whom you have a free trade agreement!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
You are roughly as protectionist as the EU. Stop believing your own propaganda.
I don't think this is true, but how rough is rough? For instance, if the EU is twice as protectionist as the US, are they still "roughly" as protectionist?
As evidence that we're less protectionist, I would point to the US routinely allowing a very high trade deficit both in policy and consumer appetite. |
Look at the WTO cases the US loses. It is not easy to quantify protectionism, but if you try it like oxfam, you don't find many substantial differences. What would those differences be?
http://www.maketradefair.com/assets...4%20English.pdf
As for the trade deficit, it is a function of your ultralose monetary policy. On the other hand, dollar recycling keeps your financial system alive. It has little to nothing to do with trade policies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"how France treated the UK after thier mad cow scare."
Ooooh, what did the evil French do, hmmm?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
Ban UK beef. The samething the Canadians are whining about. |
Nope, the EU banned UK beef, and it was perfectly justified. It is no way comparable to the single incident in Canada.
France maintained its beef ban unlawfully for a while after, one of the few problems we can't handle through direct effect and precedence of EU law. But it will be interesting, as France is liable for that under EU state liability law. The US will never compensate people for illegal trade moves.
Another thing you forget is that the EU, end thereby also the french taxpayer, funded a lot of the costs of the BSE desaster.
And Cockney, if you don't like it, join NAFTA and get lost.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:29
|
|
so if i don't like the french acting ILLEGALLY i can f-off, you're clearly a genius...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
Close. An old mirror....
|
|
|  |
 |
|
LoneWolf
|
|
Man, this is high debate.
Clearly the Euros are the superior force for good in the world. Oh, and Canada, too .
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|