 |
Should AU be made into a civgroup icon?
This poll is closed. |
| Yes |
   |
24 |
70.59% |
| No |
   |
5 |
14.71% |
| Don't know and don't care |
   |
5 |
14.71% |
| Total: |
34 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
FrustratedPoet
|
 |
All Glory To The Hypnotoad!
Mar 2002 time: 05:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Asuka
Well, having already 43 different Civgroup icons makes it rather confusing to keep track with what's what, despite they have the text specified with ALT. Now the point is that more and more people start to have something like 10 or more different icons, which makes their postbits look cluttered and serves no point as they're stuffed into one small spot and then you're supposed to recognise people based on that. Soon there's a jungle of Civgroups and it gets more confusing to know what all icons are for. So it would be better to keep the system plain and simple, by showing the icons in user profiles, the Civgroups listing and memberlist. They're already nicely organised and explained there, so people can instead check there if they need to find other similar users. Also can be expanded to the search system for a more versatile solution. |
All of those things are problems with the way civgroups are displayed in general, and I'd agree with you on most of them. However, it doesn't preclude the introduction of an AU cigroup. I agree that for many reasons, system load not being the least, moving the civgroup icons into the user profile or something similar would be a good solution. Of course, that'd be a decision for Dan to make.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|