 |
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:29
|
|
I never thought Fight Club was even remotely gay. I just thought it was really, really funny.
Yes, I've been told NUMEROUS times that it's not supposed to be funny, but it is to me. The first time I saw it in a theatre, I was asked to leave for laughing too loud. Instead of leaving, I slept through the middle hour of the movie, but I did catch the last 20 min. or so.
I borrowed it from a friend recently, and it was even funnier than I remembered. I still missed the last half-hour or so, but that's just the ADD talking.
Sikander: I'm really glad you're not that sorry, because I would never ignore anyone's posts, no matter how much I disagree; I'm posting too, and I KNOW some of the stuff I say is EXTREMELY offensive. Not that I give a sh*t, mind you.
Zylka: Uh, no. I could kick both their asses, so I think I could do better.

|
|
|  |
 |
|
C0ckney
|
|
Big Up The Macedonian Massive
Apr 2000 time: 05:29
|
|
the problem that people have with them is that their 'alternative lifestyle' involves a lot of thieving, robbing, that is to say, stealing and nicking of everything that isn't nailed down, and having a damn good go at anything that is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:29
|
|
quote: Originally posted by st_swithin
I never thought Fight Club was even remotely gay. I just thought it was really, really funny.
Yes, I've been told NUMEROUS times that it's not supposed to be funny, but it is to me. The first time I saw it in a theatre, I was asked to leave for laughing too loud. Instead of leaving, I slept through the middle hour of the movie, but I did catch the last 20 min. or so.
I borrowed it from a friend recently, and it was even funnier than I remembered. I still missed the last half-hour or so, but that's just the ADD talking.
Sikander: I'm really glad you're not that sorry, because I would never ignore anyone's posts, no matter how much I disagree; I'm posting too, and I KNOW some of the stuff I say is EXTREMELY offensive. Not that I give a sh*t, mind you.
Zylka: Uh, no. I could kick both their asses, so I think I could do better.
|
I completely agree that Fight Club is hilarious. I think most people would find it humorous, or at least understand that it was trying to be funny even if they personally didn't appreciate the humor. I was in pain from laughing so hard, and had to rewind the film a couple of times so my GF could hear the next line. I've seen Fight Club 4 times so far, and am taking a break until someone I know who hasn't seen the film happens by the house again.
What surprised me was that it was also very insightful psychologically and excellent in its portrayal of the throw away kids of my generation as adults. Whether this portrayal manages to serve as a means of understanding these people for people who haven't been one or known one well, or whether the movie is merely capable of serving as a sort of nostalgia inducer for those who lived it I don't know. I'm just glad they made it, and did such a damned good job in almost every detail.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
st_swithin
|
|
10069
Nov 2002 time: 05:29
|
|
I wonder if your almost is the same as my almost...
Did you read the book?
If yes, was it the casting?
For me, none of the characters looked or sounded the way I thought they would, even though they were mouthing all the words correctly. Other than that, I thought it was a pretty decent movie meself.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lazarus and the Gimp
The ECJ proceedings were unbelievable. Judge Pettiti came out with the following-
"The dangers of unrestrained permissiveness, which can lead to debauchery, paedophilia or the torture of others, were highlighted at the Stockholm World Conference. The protection of private life means the protection of a person's intimacy and dignity, not the protection of his baseness or the promotion of criminal immoralism." |
Well that's one judge running his mouth to the potty ina concurring opinion, though giving a different "reasoning" (well a braindead rant, actually). Overall, however, the ECHR judgment was based on a reasoning that I have no problem with:
quote: 43. The Court considers that one of the roles which the State is unquestionably entitled to undertake is to seek to regulate, through the operation of the criminal law, activities which involve the infliction of physical harm. This is so whether the activities in
question occur in the course of sexual conduct or otherwise.
44. The determination of the level of harm that should be tolerated by the law in situations where the victim consents is in the first instance a matter for the State concerned since what is at stake is related, on the one hand, to public health considerations and to the
general deterrent effect of the criminal law, and, on the other, to the personal autonomy of the individual.
...
45. ... It is evident from the facts established by the national courts that the applicants' sado-masochistic activities involved a significant degree of injury or
wounding which could not be characterised as trifling or transient. ... |
My personal opinion is it's their business, but from the legal perspective the judgment was perfectly in order.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|