 |
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drake Tungsten
My stats are from the Anti-Defamation League, not the FBI. Are you saying you don't trust a Jewish defense league to report hate crimes against Jews?
|
And I referred to the FBI stats. Any problem there? Ah yes, sources:
http://www.adl.org/PresRele/ASUS_12/4243_12.asp
quote: The Audit identifies both criminal and non-criminal acts of harassment and intimidation, including distribution of hate propaganda, threats and slurs. Compiled using official crime statistics, as well as information provided to ADL's 30 regional offices by victims, law enforcement officers and community leaders... |
While they have additional sources, I doubt they can get much information from their regional offices etc, unless the case has a high profile like this:
quote: What was so disturbing about the way law enforcement handled the Los Angeles airport case was not the hesitancy to quickly call the murders terrorism or a hate crime, but the statements they made unnecessarily that there was no evidence that the attack was a hate crime. |
http://www.wujs.org.il/activist/fea...igns/when.shtml
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
If you're anti-Israeli and not anti-semetic, why would you attack random Jews on the street as described in the article? |
Indeed. Attacking random jews because of anger over Israel is antisemitism. What else?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DAVOUT
Because those young people do not even know what anti-semitism is, that is hating people just because they exist. They identify themselves as the brothers of the Palestinians, and they identify the Jews as the enemis of the Palestinians; therefore, they believe that they have a reason to hate the Jews seen as the enemies of their brothers. This is not racism. |
You could use the same construct to claim that your average 19th century proletarian antisemite just considered jews as the enemies of the working class because of some jewish "capitalists". You don't need a degree in bungle-boo Rassenkunde to be a racist.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
Attacking people who have no connection to the event or place you are angry about simply because they fit a particular racial type can be seen as vaguely racist, yes. Don't be so obtuse Roland. It doesn't suit you at all. |
Uhm... Dino dear, that may be so unusual you can't imagine it, but I was agreeing with you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"Any time you have a reason for hating people, you are possibly a bad guy acting wrongly or even a criminal, you are not a racist."
So if I hated Turks for looting Austria in the 15th-17th century, that would not be racist?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"if your hate is directed to those who perpetrated the looting, it is not racist"
And if it is directed against today's Turks (who can't possibly have anything have to do with it), it is racist.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
Well I have a "reason": What their ancestors did. How is it different for random jews in France being held "liable" for what Israel does?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DAVOUT
These young people do not held the French Jews liable for what Israel does, they take side with the Palestinians against people they consider as on the side of Israel. |
And they consider them on Israel's side because they are jews. If they only attacked zionists (jewish or not), they'd be purely politically motivated thugs. But so they are racist thugs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
That's a classic non sequitur.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:29. Apolyton Time is 00:29. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|