 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:30
|
|
[Emily Latella] Never Mind! [/Emily Latella]
Last edited by Sikander on 15-08-2003 at 11:09
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sikander
|
 |
Boulder, Colorado, United Snakes of America
Jan 2000 time: 22:30
|
|
The main problem I have here is that GM food producers are put in the position of having to prove a negative, ie that their product is not harmful. Most people agree that there should be testing, but the question is how much? Eventually will products that have been consumed by billions of people over decades still have to be labeled as GM just as a brand new GM product with only a minimum trial would? GM or not isn't the important distinction in such a case.
edit: I had to put a their there instead of there, or they're going to have a laugh at my grammar.
Last edited by Sikander on 15-08-2003 at 16:08
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"The main problem I have here is that GM food producers are put in the position of having to prove a negative, ie that there product is not harmful."
They don't have to prove it, they just have to provide the information so that the authority can determine that a "novel food" does not
quote: - present a danger for the consumer,
- mislead the consumer,
- differ from foods or food ingredients which they are intended to replace to such an extent that their normal consumption would be nutritionally disadvantageous for the consumer. | (Art 3 para 1 Reg 258/97/EC)
That's a standard regulatory technique.
"Eventually will products that have been consumed by billions of people over decades still have to be labeled as GM just as a brand new GM product with only a minimum trial would?"
That's a good question. Once established, they would no longer meet the requirements to fall under the Regulation; it applies
quote: to the placing on the market within the Community of foods and food ingredients which have not hitherto been used for human consumption to a significant degree within the Community... | (Art 1 para 2 Reg 258/97/EC)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
The better analogy would be:
"We ask you to stay, there is no hurricane approaching. Well maybe a little wind, but no hurricane. There aren't really hurricanes. Well maybe there are. Sometimes. But not now. Not here. Trust us."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"as long as there is a meteorological service"
Which barely exists for GM Foods.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
Look closer Azazel, I said "not to believe" meaning not to take what the government says at face value.
You think it is OK to have fluoride added to your drinking water, fine. You're happy to live under a high voltage power line, great. The UK government says these things are not proven dangerous. I still won't go along with them. It is a question of individual judgement.
As for GM food, I have no problem with GM crossbreeding of varieties of wheat. I do have a problem with maize containing genes from tomatoes. Until they agree a way to distinguish between the two cases, I want all food from GM sources labelled as such so that I can choose to avoid it. Simple, unless you are Monsanto and their friends.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Azazel
So, there is no testing done on the edibility and safety of the foods? |
There sure is, but it's hardly comparable to meteorology. Most is done by interest groups that have an agenda either way, and it has to make predictions for decades, not days.
Much of the concerns about GM foods are hysteria, but there are some serious issues about it. To put it all down to "fearmongering, panicky attitude" is onesided. We also get the hysteric "save africa" with GM foods, which is similar bollocks as the anti-GM hysteria.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
Fluoride free toothpaste.
It's not that I am afraid of it, just that I stopped with fluoride toothpaste several years ago and have since found I don't need to have fillings replaced as often as I used to.
Off topic but what irritates me about that one is that we get all these pictures of children with decayed milk teeth but never anything about the effects of high levels of fluoride in drinking water on adults.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"Hysteric" as "European opposition to GM foods makes little african babies starve".
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|