 |
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by notyoueither
That storey sucks to hear, Michael, but it's not directly equivalent is it?
Here, Oerdin does everything he is told, gets the supervisor to agree to what he is doing, then gets blamed for the supervisor's incompetence by the supervisor as way of covering ass (that sounds like it to me).
|
He's been an employee for a few months, and the alleged issues are all about performance and client relations. There are no specific discriminatory issues, or legal protections.
She was a multi-year employee, with an uncontested history of exceptional reviews, and bona-fide questions of selective policy enforcement, illegal retaliatory discharge, and violation of statutory rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Yet there was no case at all, because she was an at will employee and couldn't prove retaliation or discrimination.
In other words, besides length of service and proven work history, there were some theoretically compelling theories of illegal actions, but still no case.
quote:
He is not dealing with the sharks that run a company and who want to abuse a diabled or ill employee, he is dealing with a middle management disaster and would be doing the firm a favour by getting that to the attention of the directors of the company. Not to mention that if there are grounds for wrongful dismisal, which to me it sounds like it, then he could come out of it with some compensation.
|
Wrongful discharge for all intents and purposes does not exist in most of the US, including California. The only "wrongful" discharge that is actionable is one that provably violates employment law, or an express term of an employment contract.
Normally, company directors never see, nor care about this sort of thing, except in small companies - since here you have one department getting work from another, it sounds like the scale of employer (my friend's ex-company had about 100 local area employees and 500 nationwide) where this sort of thing goes directly from HR to outside counsel, and my experience from both side is that companies will immediately close ranks around any internal *******, because it's the outside guy you already got rid of who's "causing trouble" by making a legal issue of it. The lawyers enforce that - it doesn't matter what the guy has done, unless the canned employee has it all on tape with a dozen witnesses, deny it all.
quote:
At the bottom line, the a-hole gave faulty instructions, in an inappropriate manner, and then deprived Oerdin of employment as a consequence of the failure of the project. I'd be looking for a lawyer to sue that sucker personally for whatever I could find to sue him for. |
And in California, you'd never find a lawyer to do that, because it's established law that an individual acting in connection with his employment (the *******) can not be sued personally for his work related actions. The angle of contract interference between the employer and employee has also been tried and shut down. What happens if you do it is (a) demurrer and dismissal with prejudice; (b) sanctions by the court against the plaintiff's attorney; and (c) a suit (with a certainty of summary judgment due to the successful demurrer) by ******* for malicious prosecution, if he so chooses.
I've been down both sides of this road in both public agency and private employment. Employees have virtually no recourse. At will is just that - with only certain statutory and express contractual exceptions, an employer can terminate employment "at any time, for any reason or no reason" - and that's a quote from the state supreme court.
I also got sued personally on the employer side - I didn't supervise the guy, but I had authority to recommend his termination, and I got sued for slander, breach of contract and contract interference. The end result was that the plaintiff fled the state to avoid pending legal action, the lawyer was sanctioned twice and had most parts of the suit dismissed within sixty days of filing on two demurrers, and two years later, the lawyer had to ask the courts permission to dismiss his client's remaining case, because the client hadn't paid or communicated in over six months, and his lawyer didn't want to be responsible for case management.
quote: At least, if I wanted either revenge or redress, and I would, that is what I would do. |
If you can pro per it, you could try, but employee side litigation is a brutal and fruitless path in this state.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
Sorry to hear that, Oerdin.
How long have you been at the company? I'm not sure whether you mentioned it, do you have a written work contract?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Oerdin
|
 |
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001 time: 21:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
He's been an employee for a few months, and the alleged issues are all about performance and client relations. There are no specific discriminatory issues, or legal protections.
She was a multi-year employee, with an uncontested history of exceptional reviews, and bona-fide questions of selective policy enforcement, illegal retaliatory discharge, and violation of statutory rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Yet there was no case at all, because she was an at will employee and couldn't prove retaliation or discrimination.
In other words, besides length of service and proven work history, there were some theoretically compelling theories of illegal actions, but still no case.
|
This is basically it. I worked there for a little over six months and if this chick can't get justic then I'm sure I will just be wasting my time by filing a law suite.
The one bit of good news I can think of is I asked, half sarcastically, if this meant I'd be getting a bad refrence and my boss said they don't give refrences. They just varify dates of employment. The funny thing is they called all of my refrences when I joined but they don't give refrences? I've heard of this before (I think there was a CG thread) but I didn't know that was my (ex)employers policy.
Last edited by Oerdin on 22-08-2003 at 16:00
|
|
|  |
 |
|
devilmunchkin
|
|
first circle of the inferno
Jul 2001 time: 05:30
|
|
oerdon..i'm sorry..that really sucks. maybe you should move back to S.D. where everything you know is and strike out from there? or did you already buy that home? I'm sure your family will understand because from what you tell us, these guys completely used you as a scapegoat. I wish you could sue the pants off them, but MTG has a good point...most everything wasn't in writing. if worse comes to worse, maybe you could go back into the army for a while?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|