 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
you cant! your deficit is skyrocketing. you're reduced to pleed for europe's assistance and accept the un in iraq.
of course are unifrom responce is **** the **** off!
not to you of coruse che. to the bush hurt my eye administration/.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MOBIUS
Another British soldier dead...
A couple of Americans died as well, but that's becoming so common now that it's almost not newsworthy.
The Americans also seem to be admitting defeat to such an extent that after previously refusing UN military help, they're actually begging for it!
What a humiliating climb down... |
Well, that fantasy seems to get you off, so go for it. If we're "admitting defeat" that's kinda funny, since we still own the ****ing country.
And asking the UN is a no-lose proposition. If we get the help, it increases the density of forces in critical areas because we can concentrate there. If we don't get the help, then Bush can say "we asked, and those petty gutless bastards won't help rebuild Iraq, so we have to secure the peace ourselves."
Either way, like it or not, we still run Iraq and we ain't going anywhere.
Hoo-ah!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
but i suppose yeah. if un takes controil and shoves it up bush's ass we'll all help and make money
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Spiffor
|
 |
CPA - Evil Clone brigade
Nov 2001 time: 06:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Verto
What will change if the UN takes control? What kind of difference will there be? I don't understand why France is insisting the UN commander not be American, before they will go along with the plan. |
There are two reasons for that:
1. The UN is the only tool for France to have worldwide diplomatic power. The EU could become one in the future, but isn't mature enough to be it today.
So, France wants to have an as much powerful UN as possible, because it makes France indirectly more powerful. Besides, the French public opinion widely holds the UN as the only bastion of international legitimacy. So, the French people will back any policy that empowers the UN.
2. If the UN takes control, you can bet it won't give all the reconstruction contracts to Halliburton et al. You can bet the UN sponsored Iraqi regime will give exploitation contracts to Exxon and other American companies, but also to British BP, French Elf, Russian I-forgot-the-name etc.
This is a very simple matter of realpolitik. OTOH, the French diplomats aren't playing snotty or being all "I told you so". They're really cooperating with American diplomats to find an agreement that'll fill our purse, and that'll cut some slack to Bush's popularity.
A win-win situation of sorts. Sure the Iraqi riches will continue to be raped by the west, but that'll be by the WHOLE west 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MOBIUS
|
 |
Prifysgol Caerdydd
Dec 1999 time: 15:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat Well, that fantasy seems to get you off, so go for it. If we're "admitting defeat" that's kinda funny, since we still own the ****ing country. |
'own the country'
It is that very arrogant attitude that is why the US is so unpopular in the World...
The US gave the UN the finger at the beginning because it was so confident that it could pacify Iraq all on it's own because it thought it would be a cake walk...
Now it's crying about needing UN troops and support - that sounds like admitting the US can't handle the situation... In other words 'admitting defeat'.
The coalition troops are presiding over anarchy - there is no order whatsoever and things are getting worse, not better. They can't even prevent their political supporters from being assassinated (Notice how everyone is blaming the US for failing in its security duties YET AGAIN!)
quote: And asking the UN is a no-lose proposition. If we get the help, it increases the density of forces in critical areas because we can concentrate there. If we don't get the help, then Bush can say "we asked, and those petty gutless bastards won't help rebuild Iraq, so we have to secure the peace ourselves." |
Those 'gutless bastards' just lost a couple of dozen people because the US couldn't protect them!
Also, the US shoved such a huge middle finger up their asses that the UN could quite happily tell the US to get f*cked without anyone blaming them - talk about burning your bridges!!!
Nah, the US has to relinquish power to the UN, or keep on sucking it up! My biggest concern is that the UK forces got sucked into this sorry mess by our stupid government and they have to pay the price too - because they seem to be far more stretched than the US forces...
Our country didn't want this war, yet we're still there - your country did, now reap the consequences!
quote: Either way, like it or not, we still run Iraq and we ain't going anywhere. |
Not for another few hundred bodybags at least...
Wasn't that long ago that the US chickened out of Somalia for basically the same reason - no stomach for a long haul fight...
Worst thing is that at least with Somalia, the US had a justification to be there which makes their betrayal of the Somali people even harder to take...
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|