 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:30
|
|
When I look at Imran's posts, I barely see any mention of SK, specially any metion that they might have some say in what can be done vis a vi NK, cause, guess what, if the US wants to attack NK, they need SK approval, for anything more than airstrikes from carriers or bases in japan, and even then, Sk is the one to pay the rpice for any big war. And in general, this seemt o be a rather common thing in the US, ignoring SK (heck, we did it in 1953, why not today?)
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
When I look at Imran's posts, I barely see any mention of SK, specially any metion that they might have some say in what can be done vis a vi NK, cause, guess what, if the US wants to attack NK, they need SK approval, for anything more than airstrikes from carriers or bases in japan, and even then, Sk is the one to pay the rpice for any big war. And in general, this seemt o be a rather common thing in the US, ignoring SK (heck, we did it in 1953, why not today?) |
IIRC, the SK's did not want to sign the Armistice. They wanted to continue the war and drive the Chinese back to where they came from.
I assume, GePap, you are endorsing this view rather than the Eisenhower position?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|