 |
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
Well, even if we couldn't take on ROW (which we could IMO), then that just proves my point all the more.
If you want to paint the US as a unipole, then you've got to recognize that the US doesn't have the capability to perpetuate this situation and has never really had this capability. So why care too much about it? If you want to paint the US as a superpower, then we can perpetuate this situation forever, basically.
What Bush does now will have almost zero impact on these facts, unless he gets us nuked. Wars in Afghanistan, Iraq, North Korea, and Iran during his presidency won't change the parameters. Continued large deficits (which aren't planned, currently) during his presidency won't change the parameters. |
Can't claim to understand that post. But economic growth is closely related to net investment. Military spending is mostly consumption. 50-100 billion $ for Iraq is not domestic investment either. Add to that a savings rate that only covers depreciation.
There are other factors, like the growing authoritarianism, corruption and superstition.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"The point is that $100 billion for Iraq, while a lot of money, will not make a difference on the timescale that about which ef is talking. Even several hundreds of billions of dollars a year for various adventures during Bush's presidency won't make much of a difference."
Well it adds up. Also, why are you limiting this to Bush? I see him just as a symptom.
"I don't think you can have a good enough sense of the US to know whether it is "growing" or not."
You think police and prosecution powers are not growing, the control of money over politics is not growing, and nationalism and religious fundamentalism are not growing?
"Probably, I don't either, but my sense is directly opposite of yours."
You've always lived in a reality alternate to mine.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DanS
|
 |
Kickball Capital of the World
Jan 1970 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: Also, why are you limiting this to Bush? I see him just as a symptom. |
Just following ef's scenario. He quoted a structural balance in 2000 and all of the ills that followed.
quote: You think police and prosecution powers are not growing, the control of money over politics is not growing, and nationalism and religious fundamentalism are not growing? |
No, no, no, and no [edit: I guess that should be yes, yes, yes, and yes. ]. Easy answers, at least on a more long-term basis.
The police are better and cleaner now than they have ever been. The FBI in Hoover's time was rather abusive of its power. Money has always been a part of American politics and now no more than then. I can think of times infinitely worse in our recent history (trusts). Nationalism is on the decrease. The first Gulf War was an order of magnitude more shameful than the second. Religious fundamentalism is very much on the decrease. I come from an area that was very fundamentalist, so I know. I can give you specific examples, if you are interested.
You're out of touch with the US, Roland. You always have been.
Last edited by DanS on 31-08-2003 at 13:50
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"No, no, no, and no. Easy answers, at least on a more long-term basis."
So it will all be well in the future. Sure.
What interests me though: "Nationalism is on the decrease." How do you come to that conclusion?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"There was no "Proud to be an American" song for Gulf War II.2"
There was no FOX "news" 20 years ago.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
A rabidly jingoistic program being successful is a weaker indicator than one song?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
Conservatism is not an indicator for any of the things that Hershell mentioned. |
The rise of the extreme right is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
"The extreme right isn't rising."
Ashcroft, Cheney, Rumsfeld would qualify as "rechtsextrem" here. You just see the political spectrum in a different way.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
What has their time in politics got to do with this?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DanS
It just seems prudent to mention that these guys have been in power off and on since Methusela. |
Did they push the same politics with the same influence under Bush I?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|