 |
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Facts stay:
US only wants:
_To push its interests abraod. It doesn matter how many are killed by doing it. Unless there is a too big backlash against her in which time, it will stop.
_Protect its own people. This doesnt mean protect Indians or anyone else. If with her actions it does, so much the better, if by its actions it makes more Indians be killed, sorry.
clear goat mama teddy? it's the supreme irony you calling me a piece of ****. check it out on the dictionary.
now in what regards Pakistan, I see that Indians are begining to understand very clearly.
The domino is clear:
US wanted to satiate its bloodlust and confirm that still has the power to do so (as a sidenot these are clear signals of "imperial" decay)
Pakistan found itslef on a tight spot. So did the US.
US collaborated with the terrorism backing dictator in order to be in a easier position to drop some bombs.
collaborate with dictators and terrorists is not a first for her.
Now Pakistan said: damn if i dont colaborate those ruthless maniacs (like he's an angel) could start dropping bombs on me too
So he did.
But by doing so he wanted something in return.
main interest pressuring India.
US has no intention of screwing you up (it doesnt have anything to gain for the moment) but as long as it needs pakistan it will do so by giving it geopolitical clout.
this is the way it works.
dont try to see it "rationally" or based on democracy or human rights.
US doesnt operate like that.
few countries do, but the US prefers to have no social state if it means more bombs. so more damage. and more profits to the big corps.
it operates based on interests.
think of it like a beast: if it can it will do, if it hurts it will not.
Last edited by Bereta_Eder on 11-09-2003 at 01:12
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by aneeshm
That , in reply to paiktis , is why so few of the third world and Middle Eastern nations are supporting the US actions . And that is why America is unlikely to find many allies in it's future raids/wars . |
There is antiamericanism all over the globe but it is located with white hot fury in middle east and parts of africa. teh reasons are much much older. it has to do with israel and its continuous support to it despite the thousand of palestinian civilian deaths.
US tries to have good relations with the governments of these countries. if they are dictatorships, it's better because if they are democracies they would hear more the opinions of the people who are very antiamerican.
europe just thinks in terms of what it can get - thats the first "principle"
and it also doesnt agree with the US on the way to handle things. that's second.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
MrFun, cold war was sometimes the reason, some times an excellent excuse to put up a pupet regime that would sell her things.
it still does it and there's no cold war.
but maybe i should leave che do the talking because it doesnt seem nice for me critisizing another country.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
quote: Originally posted by aneeshm
We all have to look to our own best interests . What gets me is the USA's persistent refusal to see their own . To finish one dictator , you support five . A few decades later , you have five more to deal with . AND five times the resistance and terrorism . Isn't this obvious ? |
Maybe it thinks that it wll not have to deal with them.
Osama and his thugs were supported by the US though when Afganis were fighting the USSR.
Spread/plant winds and you will harvest tornadoes, (i dont know how to translate this little phrase better in english)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
And it is true that we'll all have to look for our best interests. it's good to realize sometimes that our interests is for our neighboor to be ok too. a little thing i like about the european union is that it has come to this realization for its members. although it took attrocities to happen to finally accept this little fact.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by aneeshm
In my opinion , no nation , not even the sole superpower , can do this alone . |
I agree. In fact I don't think terrorism could be eliminated even if every nation on earth was working against it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Eliminating its source will take a long time but it is not unfeasable IMHO.
Punching wildly at the water will not do it though. You have to go to the source of the river and stop it.
What's the use in celebrating the Bali killer conviction if there's 1 million other people behind him ready to take his place?
I think this fundamentalism is a new (rather sick) "ideology" like many others before it. Its emergance is why the world will not be the same again. And it had been predicted by bright minds of sociopolitical sciences a long time ago.
But it mainly has to do with the US. Other people have other problems, many times the US is one of them.
I'll be sure to remember Chile as well as WTC tomorrow.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
for the economy to get better, maybe some "superpowers" and some others should stop exploiting it and its rich people in that country not getting richer while the poor get poorer?
who are sponsoring terrorism?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|