 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
Sure there is. Unions are the basis of a free society. Worker and non-worker organization is a prerequisite for a free society. Economic self-determination is a fundamental right. |
ur adding all sorts of values into democracy that don't have to exist. if u can't realize this then u r seriously deprived of perspective.
unions are a useful countermeasure to corporate power. they are not some inherent part of a democracy. so just hush.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
If you think democracy is the same thing as having elections, you are seriously deprived of perspective. |
u r obviously extremely culturally egotistical. I think democracy is having fair and cyclical elections. what the ppl actually want is up to them. in either case tho. we are setting up FOR a democracy. not actually practicing one yet.
so ur wrong twice. which is a definite feat of merit.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
What the people want is to organize. That's why there exists a union of the unemployed. Hence, the occupation authorities's actions are extremely anti-democratic. Thus, you are wrong.
Building a civil society when worker organizations are crushed doesn't work. If we are "setting up for democracy," we're doing it incompetently. |
once they start elections they can form all the unions their lil hearts desire. this is transition not the practice. and actually democracy allows tyranny of the majority. we never said we were going to give them a "civil society"(imagine the cultural backlash against that?). only that we'd give them a democracy.
so u have no ground to stand on.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
A democracy won't last without a civil society, and independent unions are one of its bases. If the state is given authoritarian powers during the occupation it will likely keep them.
And actual democracy is that peoples' liberties are respected by the state. |
no. u have to stop adding values to "democracy." democracy is the will of the ppl. insofar as the elections can be kept fair and cyclical. the rest of the pie is completely up to the ppl. thats the point.
u keep demanding things that aren't required. they are what you want in a society, not whats required in a democracy.
distinctly different.
I also assume that after the occupation the arabs will want to frame and handle as they see fit. which is the point of giving power over to elections. all this whining is not only off base, its also premature.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
Democracy is that the will of the people is reflected in the government. If people want to form a paper free from gov't intrusion or if people want to organize to get a livable wage or not have their oil go off to subisidize US corporations that don't even hire native Iraqis, they should be free to do that in a democracy. That's how it works. The government isn't the only institution that reflects popular will - it's reflected in newspapers and unions as well.
It's absolutely wrong the the US is tyrannically attacking Iraqi liberties - without any electoral mandate mind you. It's hurting Iraqis and their nascent civil society. This "whining" is neither off-base nor premature. |
ur absolutely right. and when elections start the iraqi's can start demonstrating that will. thats the tool of democracy. and the ppl can decide how their will is reflected.
once elections start.
we are not attacking their liberties they are living in the ashes of post war and post oppression. there is a transition time. if we come back and the gov't is being run corruptively and subversively defying or tainting elections then I will listen to ur rants. but elections have never been held yet.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
But we're running the government corruptively and tyrannically. Without any elections. We're undermining their expressions of democracy.
And we are attacking their liberties. What else do you call our behavior wrt the union of the unemployed? |
there was bound to be a transition time. democracy is a luxury. we want to give the iraqi's that luxury. but its not an instant thing.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
What the hell does that mean? Unions should be suppressed because of "transition time?" Why, exactly, are worker organizations a luxury? To maximize the pork we give to our corporations? |
to minimize the costs bore by the US in giving iraq its democracy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ramo
Their weapon is protest. Their goal is different from a traditional union (i.e. more just occupation policies). |
yes I never said they shouldn't be allowed to protest. but I'm hesitant to call them a union. unions can go on strike. they can't.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|