 |
|  |
 |
|
Dr. A. Cula
|
|
Heh, and this is where having a power-crazed communist dictator comes in handy. Ours filled the country with dozens of coal/oil/gas burning power plants, hydro plants and even started building a nuclear power plant before he was executed. Now, with only 2 out of 4 reactors ready and running at full capacity, we have more than enough electricity. The only real problem was this summer, when, because of the drought (sp?), there was not enough water in the Danube for the nuke plant or in the inner rivers for the hydro plants. The answer was to fire up the old coal burning plants and shut down all factories that were behind with paying their electricity bills.
Speaking of Greece, about 3 or 4 months ago, I heard they were getting ready to import electricity from Romania, and we cancelled exports when we had to shut down the nuke plant, so, probably, they couldn't have helped much.
Anyway, it's nice that everything is back to normal.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
The real problem seems to be the vulnerability of the transmission lines. I have long wondered why terrorists don't destroy power lines more often. That would be extremely disruptive.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr. A. Cula
|
|
quote: Originally posted by CerberusIV
The real problem seems to be the vulnerability of the transmission lines. I have long wondered why terrorists don't destroy power lines more often. That would be extremely disruptive. |
Well, it's one thing to plant a bomb in the middle of a city square full with people and it's another to destroy some wires in the middle of nowhere. Guess which one causes the strongest impression on the masses. Furthermore, the second method wouldn't even get prime time on the news, the most coverage it would get would be a side note about some freak accident in a place nobody heard about.
Plus, the consequences of power line sabotage are not immediately evident, even if more disastruous in the long run.
IMHO terrorists are after immediate public attention.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
Not being able to watch the latest episode of their favourite TV soap drivel has an immediate impact on the masses as soon as they find out why.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Cruddy
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Datajack Franit
Actually the lefty parties in italy are to blame... |
Pretty sure at least part of the blame for recent world wide power cuts is private companies cutting down on spare capacity and repair engineers.
Don't blame the left for that... but your other points are true enough.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
Perque the left would oppose the building of hydroplants? Perque?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
I wonder if this has anything to do with the black out on the East Coast of the United States. This is just to strange. You never know, someone may be hacking into the power grid and shuting the power down.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jack_www
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Mike, ditto the US. The reason for lack of investment here is that the power lines are "regulated." They are treated as a public resource and prices are controlled. Thus, the private sector does not invest in new capacity.
Something similar has happened in telecom. Several years ago, the FCC ruled that telephone companies would have to share new high speed transmission lines with competitors - this even while cable and sattelite companies do not. As a result, telecom companies virtually halted construction of high speed optical transmission lines. In fact, it was this FCC ruling that set off the stock market collapse.
But where is this demand for "regulation" and "sharing" coming from? Surely not the free market right? |
Also you forget that scare in the mid 90's that power lines caused cancer and was latter proved false. Many people still have that stuck in their minds and dont want power lines near their houses. So since their is such a resistance to building them, they choise not to do it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
Did you know that just before the power crisis hit here in California we shut down a perfectly good nuclear reactor?
And, even while Owl Gore did not succeed, Gore strongly advocated shutting down hydroelectric dams (or not building new ones) in the Northwest because the dams disrupted salmon runs.
Yeah, the left cares more about fish and the environment than people. But it fits a larger anti-capitalist pattern of the left where any new investment in infrastructure of almost any type is to be opposed. There is a proposition on the ballot in California, prop 53, that requires the government to spend at least 3% on infrastructure. The reason for this is that the Democrat/Greens have cut infrastructure spending here to near zero. In the recent recall debate, all the leftist candidates opposed prop 53 and the Republican candidates favored it.
The divide between left and right on essential infrastructure here in the US is remarkable. The lack of investment is the cause of our increasing difficulties as a nation. We lack power transmission capacity, our roads are crowded beyond belief, and we are increasingly dependent on foreign oil.
At least here in California, the people know who is the cause of their higher electric bills. It is time for payback from the people.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|