 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sava
The whole black comment was stupid and he should not have a job at ESPN if he's going to make stupid comments like that. He should leave his stupid racist opinions to his radio show. |
I just don't see anything racist about his comment. Care to enlighten me?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
Neal Boortz did a pretty good breakdown of Rush's comments.
quote:
Do you need any further clarification of what Limbaugh said? Do I have to break it down for you? OK ... step-by-step:
1. Donovan McNabb hasn't been a very good quarterback from the beginning.
Anything racist there? If there is, I can't find it. Do we now find ourselves at the point where you cannot criticize a black athlete without being called a racist?
2. The National Football League has some social concerns.
Translation, there's a bit of political correctness in the NFL front office. I don't know if that's true or not. You tell me! Is there anything inherently wrong with bringing up the possibility?
3. Some sportswriters want to see a black quarterback do well.
Well now isn't that a shocking statement! Can you imagine that! A few weeks ago a female place kicker actually kicked a field goal in a Division 1A college football game. Do you think that it is at all possible that there were some sportswriters out there, maybe even some female sportswriters, who wanted to see that kick go through the uprights? Would that make these sportswriters sexist? So we find it perfectly reasonable to understand why a female sportswriter might want to see that gal kick that football, but you just can't imagine a black sportswriter wanting to see a black quarterback succeed? Come on, admit it. You went to government schools, didn't you?
4. Donovan McNabb has been getting more credit for the team's success than perhaps he deserves.
Maybe so, maybe not! I'm certainly not knowledgeable enough to comment on that. I couldn't name any Eagles player other than McNabb .. and if it weren't for this story I wouldn't even be able to name him. I'm just not that much of a fan. But can't a question like this be addressed to literally hundreds of players in each of the four major sports?
So .. there you go. Rush's statement broken down into four easily understandable statements, none of which is the slightest bit racially insensitive, let alone racist. |

|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Q Cubed
yeah, but see, here's where the problem lies... and i think it was really kinda a brain fart for him.
his audience on radio, which wouldn't've reacted this way to what he said, is primarily conservative.
his audience on tv, which is considerably more mixed, had a different reaction.
i don't think he was being racist, but rather that he forgot how controversial some things he says are--and which audience he was talking to.
a brain fart, that's all it was. |
Bull! The most entertaining sports broadcaster of all time was Howard Cosell. His trademark was controversial and even political remarks.
I was a great Cosell fan. I'll never forget the first time I heard him. He had a morning broadcast that went on radio just before 8. The first broadcast that I heard was just prior to the 1964 World Series. Cosell was saying the Yankees were not as good as the media made them out to be. He thought they could be beaten by St. Louis.
(It is remarkable how similar his comment then was to Limbaugh's comment. Cosell was challenging the group think of the media as was Limbaugh. Cosell turned out to be right. The Yankees lost the world series to St. Louis.)
But what me a real fan is that I had never heard anything thoughtful or controversial from a sports broadcaster before. Cosell went on to make Ali a star by, among other things, challenging the media bias against Ali. He was never shy about discussing the hard or controversial issues.
Limbaugh would have been a refreshing breath of fresh air in sports. It is too bad we will not hear from him again or from anyone like him.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
Prescription Painkillers Linked to Hearing Loss
The LA Times is reporting that prolonged use of high dosages of Vicodin and similar prescription painkillers has been linked to hearing loss in at least 48 cases. Doctors at the House Ear Institute (HEI) and other medical centers have verified that exceptionally high dosages of these medications for several months have caused sudden hearing loss.
One of the most commonly prescribed painkillers, Vicodin is effective against many different kinds of pains. Unfortunately, it is an addictive synthetic opiate, which can result in long-term, high-dosage abuse after the medicinal reason for taking the drug has disappeared. Some people believe that doctors are too willing to prescribe these potent narcotic painkillers, and a government study seems to confirm this. The study found that 1.6 million Americans began taking painkillers like Vicodin for nonmedical reasons in 1998!
HEI doctors now believe that they saw their first case of Vicodin-induced hearing loss in 1993, although they didn't identify the cause at that time. They first reported Vicodin-related hearing loss incidents to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 1999, and again last month.
Knoll Pharmaceutical Co., the makers of Vicodin, added a hearing loss warning to the drug's label in 2000, but it seems to have gone largely unnoticed. The FDA worked with the manufacturer on the wording of the warning. They plan no additional action, because hearing loss seems to be a very rare side effect that occurs only when the drug is used inappropriately.
Some doctors think the problem may be much more common that is currently believed. Because determining the cause of a person's hearing loss is often difficult or impossible, doctors may not be making the connection between hearing loss and Vicodin. This situation is compounded by the fact that patients may be unwilling to reveal the extent of their painkiller use.
Doctors report that sudden and rapid hearing loss is normally the result of either autoimmune disease or medications like antibiotics or diuretics. Steroids are often effective in stopping or reversing hearing loss related to autoimmune disease; terminating the offending medication is often similarly effective. Cases that don't fit either of these classic patterns should be examined for a possible Vicodin connection.
Vicodin is a combination of acetaminophen and hydrocodone and is also sold under the brand names Lorcet, Lortab and Hydrocet. It is the combination of acetaminophen and hydrocodone that seems to cause hearing loss, though scientists don't yet know how.
http://www.hearinglossweb.com/Medical/Causes/vic.htm
Lorcet is the painkiller that Rush alegedly took.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:31
|
|
Ned, I doubt Limbaugh used painkillers then lost his hearing. It's more likely, by what the maid said regarding timing, that he was having ear problems and then began using painkillers.
quote: I am not sure of your statement is true, at least currently. |
He has been a vocal proponent of the drug war. I remember an interview he did for Playboy magazine and he was asked if he had ever used pot and he said he had. He was then asked if he felt he should have been punished for using pot - which is what he advocates for others - and he said no. Why? Get this, because he was a conservative who was experimenting. I kid you not, that is what he said.
quote: If he himself became addicted and continued to call for imprisonment of the addicted, then so be it. He should be jailed. But typically we do not jail the addicted on a first offense, but simply fine them, put them on probation and ask them to go to a drug rehab center. Rush should have this right as well, shouldn't he? |
Let him spend a weekday/weekend in jail first, that's the minimum done to others who use drugs in most jurisdictions. No, that's too easy, give him whatever the punishment is in Texas! Actually, I don't want him punished at all because it's immoral to punish people for exercising their freedom, that's what these phony conservatives like Rush can't figure out when they're telling us how they believe in freedom while those evil liberals dont. But I can already see his apologists like Bill O'Reilly and Joe Scarborough spinning this matter, oh poor Rush, he was in pain and got addicted to painkillers. He deserves our sympathy, not our scorn. Where are these ******* hypocrites when people are jailed for using medical pot? They're putting them in the cages. **** 'em!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:31
|
|
Oh, btw, we'll see if Rush is the snake he seems to be. He's said he'll cooperate in any way he can. If that's true, then he really is a despicable piece of sh!t. Oops, I mean a rat. For someone to use drugs and then turn their supplier in is slimy, but if he merely bought them from the maid (after pressuring her), then he probably had no contact with the suppliers. If he was using drugs, that's tells me nothing about his character. If he turns on others, that speaks volumes.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|