 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
Remember the guy in North Arkansas who came out of a coma after being in it since 1984? There's probably a few articles about it that can be found. I think shortly after he woke up, he asked if President Reagan was okay (perhaps he'd gone into it right after he got the attempt.)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
This isn't a coma. This is massive, IRREVERSIBLE brain damage. There is no coming back from this, period. She is what she is, and what she will always be.
Why do people assume the worst about the husband? Why not believe that he truly wants what this woman, whom he loved, would have wanted?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
He is next of kin. It is his legal right to withhold treatment.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:31
|
|
No, it's not. This would be in the same catagory as if Florida suddenly decided to outlaw interracial marriages. It's clearly unconstitional.
If Bunnygrrl went into a PVS, I, not her mother or father or anyone else, would have first and final say over whether or not to pull the plug and feeding tubes. I am her spouse, my decision trumps everyone elses except hers if she leaves a living will (and vice versa). The same for this woman's husband.
The state has unconstututionally interfered in a private family matter.
Just so you know, people in PVSs frequently appear to respond to the outside world. That's the brain stem. What makes us human, who we are, is all in the frontal lobes. When that's gone, so are we.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
Suppose you left your 1 year old toddler alone in the house for a day. Would the state be interfering in a private family matter by charging you with negligence? |
I knew someone was gonna respond this way. The difference is that the state is within its rights to interfer in this example, and we mostly recongize this is better for society. In the case of the FL woman, society has already said, this is a place the state may not interfere.
quote: So if we cut away all the rest of your brain, you are still Chegitz? |
Nope. I'd be dead.
quote: What if you had no body to go with the frontal lobes, just the lobes in a jar.
Would you still be Chegitz? |
Again, I'd be dead. Though the rest of my body and the brain stem might be able to stay alive if it was force fed food and water. But I'd be dead for all intents and purposes.
Assuming, however, that you developed a way to maintain a brain in a jar, then yes, those pieces of frontal lobe would be me. Although with no access to sensory data, I expect I'd go mad rather quickly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
So society = courts? |
Thirty years ago there was a woman named Karen Ann Quilin. Karen made the mistake of taking barbituates and booze together, and consequently melted her brain. She was effectively brain dead. For ten years, her parents fought in the courts, people marched, gathered peitions, argued in legislatures, etc. We won that fight.
quote: I see plenty of people in society that objected to the decision to let Terri die just because her husband requested that she have the tube removed. |
That's because, like you, they don't understand how PVS works. Also, many people feel that life should be preserved, even if the person inside the body is long since gone. They care more for the form than the essence, a typical conservative problem.
quote: Well, maybe there's more to being a person than just a frontal lobe. |
No, there's more to being alive. If I tak out your heart, you're dead. If I destroy your frontal lobes, your body will survive, but you will have ceased to exist.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jules
|
 |
Chairman & CEO, Dallas Oil Company
Jul 2001 time: 00:31
|
|
A step in the right direction. 
http://www.cnn.com/2003/LAW/10/22/coma.woman/index.html
quote: Terri Schiavo's husband grants her parents visitation rights
Wednesday, October 22, 2003 Posted: 9:11 PM EDT (0111 GMT)
PINELLAS PARK, Florida (CNN) -- The husband of Terri Schiavo, a brain-damaged woman at the center of a Florida right-to-die controversy, dropped his objections Wednesday to letting her parents visit her, attorneys said.
It was not immediately clear when Bob and Mary Schindler and Terri's siblings would be allowed to visit. They will not be entitled to updates on her medical condition.
Terri was moved late Tuesday to Morton Plant Hospital in Clearwater after Gov. Jeb Bush ordered her feeding tube reinserted. Throughout Wednesday, she was being rehydrated intravenously in preparation for reinsertion of the feeding tube.
The parents and Terri's husband and legal guardian, Michael Schiavo, have been at the center of a lengthy and contentious battle over whether Terri should be kept alive indefinitely in a persistent vegetative state with the feeding tube, as the parents want, or allowed to die, as the husband wants. A court ruled that the tube could be removed last week, but the state Legislature quickly passed a law giving the governor the right to intervene.
In another development, David Demeres, the chief judge of Pinellas County Circuit Court, ordered lawyers for both sides to reach an agreement within five days to designate an independent guardian for Terri, as required under the law signed by the governor.
The new guardian would become Terri Schiavo's advocate in legal proceedings, but Michael Schiavo would remain the decision-maker.
If an agreement cannot be reached, Demeres said, he will appoint Dr. Jay Wolfson, a professor of health and law at Stetson University, as the guardian. Wolfson also works for the College of Public Health at Florida State University and the College of Medicine at the University of South Florida.
The law passed by the state Legislature Tuesday and quickly signed by Bush authorized the governor to issue an executive order reinserting the feeding tube and said a "guardian ad litem" should be appointed to the case.
A guardian ad litem is a person appointed by the court to represent the best interests of one or more children in a court action that may affect them. "Ad litem" is Latin for "for this litigation." |
It'd be good to see some reconciliation between the parties at this point. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|