 |
|
Fromafar
|
|
I found something at
http://support.intel.co.jp/jp/suppo...uid/cpuinfo.htm .
At the "normal" Intel site, it is listed as not supported anymore. Maybe we should just comment out the processor speed function call, if this causes crashes at some machines. It doesn't seem to be used in the program, other than being reported in a log file or at the screen.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Seriously... I think this is unneccessary too.
The processor requirements are fast becoming moot, as most any machine is capable of running this, abeit slowly.
The only theroretical thing they could be looking for would be MMX capability for a software render. You can find that out in a DirectX call though, so...
Lets check it really is unused, and then turn it into a stub. Agreed?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
BTW.. the regular intel site still distributes a CPUInfo package, but the dll is actually 2 years older, and unsurprisingly, doesn't work properly, either.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Maquiladora
|
|
I also have XP2000+ cpu and it reported 0MHz, and worked fine. I am on win98se by the way.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Fromafar
|
|
Just checked it. It is never used, except for logging. I'll remove it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Unbelievable.
I just finished backing up and installing 98 and XP to different partitions, and setting up BootMagic, etc...
I just compiled CTP2_DBG.EXE and CTP2.EXE, using the latest code patches and the final version works just fine... and the ones I was compiling in XP never did... I'm at a loss what the issue was; everything else on the system worked perfectly... but getting it working was all that mattered.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
* MrBaggins smiles.
Well... everythings compiling and working perfectly on 98.
I may give XP a shot again for development work... but I don't need to rely on it, since it works just fine on the 98 dual boot.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Visual Studio 6 Enterprise (sp5) both times.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
drulius
|
|
Lubbock, Tx USA
Jan 1970 time: 23:31
|
|
This is great news. I will be trying to compile on XP again this weekend.
Are there any steps different from the "how to compile" document when you are compiling on XP?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
Nope, although I did have to force a full rebuild of ctpdb, prior to doing a full rebuild of ctp2_dbg, or I sometimes get errors in the custom compile steps, although nothing changes (tmp directory still there, etc.) The full rebuilds do solve that though.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|